Calculus-integration over mass

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chandran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 8K views
chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
There are certain integrals which say integration over all m ,integration over all area,integration over line. I am confused with this. In calulus i am comfortable with integration with limits of an independent variable and the
integration results in the area under the curve. But in doing the moment of inertia of a solid about the axis a small dm is present inside the integral
and we say to integrate it for M. What is this integration about M exactly .

Similarly what is integration over line and area. How can i visualize this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chandran said:
There are certain integrals which say integration over all m ,integration over all area,integration over line. I am confused with this. In calulus i am comfortable with integration with limits of an independent variable and the
integration results in the area under the curve. But in doing the moment of inertia of a solid about the axis a small dm is present inside the integral
and we say to integrate it for M. What is this integration about M exactly .

Similarly what is integration over line and area. How can i visualize this?

For an infinitesimal mass, what you have is

[itex]dm = \rho dV[/itex]

where [itex]\rho[/itex] is the mass density. So, in general, the mass of the object is the integral of dm over the volume that is occupied by that object, i.e.

[itex]M = \int dm = \int \rho dV[/itex]

If the density is uniform throughout the mass, then you can factor the density out of the integral and all you have, after doing the integral is

[itex]M = \rho V[/itex]

which is what you are familiar with as the mass of the object.

The line and surface integral usually comes in in electrostatic. What you are doing actually is doing a line charge and surface charge integral. So instead of dm, you have [itex]d\lambda[/itex] or [itex]d\sigma[/itex] where [itex]\lambda[/itex] is the infinitesimal line charge defined as

[itex]\lambda = Q dl[/itex]

and [itex]d\sigma[/itex] is defined as

[itex]d\sigma = Q dA[/itex].

You'll notice that this is of similar form that we had for dm, where the "nature" of the quantity (i.e. mass M, or charge Q) is paired with the "dimension", i.e volume or length or area.

Zz.
 
Last edited: