Calorimetry - Calculating absorbed and released heat

  • Thread starter Thread starter edimeo25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calorimetry Heat
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the heat absorbed by water and the heat released by burning ethanol in a makeshift calorimeter setup. The calculations show that the heat absorbed by 280g of water, with a temperature change of 30°C, is 35.1kJ, which equals the heat released by 20g of ethanol. The molar heat of combustion for ethanol is calculated to be 81.08kJ/mol. Participants also clarify the distinction between Q and ΔH, noting that while they can be identical in some contexts, they differ in others. The calculations and concepts presented are affirmed as correct.
edimeo25
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the heat absorbed by the water in the calorimeter and the heat released by 1,0g of burning ethanol. Then, calculate the molar heat of combustion (kJ/mol) of the ethanol.

The calorimeter used was very makeshift: ethanol in an alcohol burner was lit under a can containing water, both of which were placed inside a hollowed out larger can.

Here is what is known:
mass of ethanol burned = 20g
mass of heated water = 280g
change in temperature = 30"degrees"C


Homework Equations



Q(water) = -Q(ethanol)
mc"delta"T = - (mc"delta"T)
280g*4.184J/g"degree"C*30 = -Q(ethanol)

The Attempt at a Solution


Q(water) = mc"delta"T = 280g*4.184J/g"degree"C*30"degrees"C = 35145.6J = 35.1kJ

Q(ethanol) = -Q(water) = -35.1kJ (for 20g)

Q(per gram of ethanol) = -35.1kJ / 20g = -1.755kJ/g = -1.76kJ/g

Q or "delta"H? (per mol of ethanol) = -1.76kJ/g * 46.07g/mol = 81.08kJ/mol


--> Does this make sense? Is it right? And what is the difference between Q and "delta"H?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK.

Check enthalpy definition. In some circumstances it is identical to Q, in some it is not.

--
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top