Calorimetry: mix of ice, water vapor inside a copper container

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a calorimetry problem involving a copper container, water vapor, and ice, aiming to find the equilibrium temperature (ΔT) when all components reach the same final temperature. Participants emphasize that ΔT is equal for all components at equilibrium, with the heat released by the vapor calculated using both specific heat and latent heat formulas. There is confusion regarding the phase transitions of water vapor and ice, particularly how to determine if these transitions are complete and how the heat is distributed among the components. It is suggested that if the assumption of complete phase transitions is incorrect, it could lead to nonsensical results for the final temperature. The conversation concludes with a reassurance that the calculations appear reasonable, despite minor discrepancies in the specific heat values used.
powerof
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We insert into a copper container (weighing 1.5 Kg) 3 Kg of water vapour at 100 ºC. Inside the container there are 10 Kg of ice at -10ºC. Find the ΔT when the system reaches the equilibrium.

Known data: the specific heats of water, copper and ice and the latent heat of ice and water vapour.

Homework Equations



Q=mcΔT

The Attempt at a Solution



We know that ΔT is equal for all the components when the equilibrium point is reached, therefore:

\left\{\begin{matrix}Q_{absCopp}+Q_{absIce}=Q_{relsVapour}<br /> \\ \Delta T=\frac{Q_{abs(Copp)}}{m_{Cu}c_{Cu}}=\frac{Q_{abs(Ice)}}{m_{ice}c_{ice}}=\frac{Q_{rels(Vapour)}}{m_{vapor}c_{vapor}}<br /> <br /> \end{matrix}\right.

I don't know how to proceed. The changes of state confuse me. Please give me some clues.

Have a nice day.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
powerof said:
We know that ΔT is equal for all the components when the equilibrium point is reached

All the components have the same Tfinal at equilibrium, by definition. They have different Tinitial's. What does this tell you about their ΔT's?
 
It would mean that ΔT=Tfinal-(-10ºC) for copper and for ice (assuming the copper and ice have the same temperatures) and ΔT=100-Tfinal for water vapour.

The amount of heat Q released by the water vapour is Q1+Q2=Q(vapour) where Q1=mcΔT(vapour) [the usual formula] and Q2=mL(vapour) [the total heat released after the complete phase transition, ie, condensation].

Similarly for the ice we would have the heat absorbed when going from -10ºC to 0ºC and then the heat absorbed when going from solid to liquid.

But this is assuming that both phase transitions are complete, but how do I know that? Also, how is the heat released from the condensation distributed? I mean how much of that heat is used to warm and melt the ice and how much to warm the container?
 
Last edited:
powerof said:
It would mean that ΔT=Tfinal-(-10ºC) for copper and for ice (assuming the copper and ice have the same temperatures) and ΔT=100-Tfinal for water vapour.

The amount of heat Q released by the water vapour is Q1+Q2=Q(vapour) where Q1=mcΔT(vapour) [the usual formula] and Q2=mL(vapour) [the total heat released after the complete phase transition, ie, condensation].

Keep in mind that the specific heat of water is different before condensation (when it's still vapor) and after condensation (when it's now liquid).

Similarly for the ice: the specific heat is different before melting (when it's still ice) and after melting (when it's now liquid).

But this is assuming that both phase transitions are complete, but how do I know that?

I don't know a way to decide this in advance. Maybe someone else has an idea. However, if this assumption is incorrect, you should get a nonsensical value for Tfinal. (Hint: this assumption means that all the water ends up as liquid.) Then you can change your assumption and try again.
 
Writing in LateX is somewhat tiring, so I scanned the paper on which I did my calculations for you to read, if you don't mind:

http://imgur.com/a/eUIyp#0

The result appears to make sense (~90ºC) so that's reassuring.
 
It looks like you've accounted for all the different Q's, and you're fairly close. However, for heat of vaporization of water, I have 2260 J/g = 540 cal/g, not 500; and for specific heat of copper, I have 389 J/kg-K not 398.

As a check on the arithmetic, you can calculate all the Q's separately, using your final temperature, and verify that they add up correctly.
 
Well, the accurate values of the constants are the least of my concerns. I'm not dealing with a real world problem so I don't need precision. As long as I understood it conceptually, I'm happy. Thank you for your help.
 
Back
Top