Can a formula be used to modify data patterns from linear to wave-like?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Faultline369
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Patterns
Faultline369
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If a pattern is found between two sets of data and one is linear and the other resembles a wave, is there some type of modification to make the wave linear? (so that it is related easier to the linear data).

Like a formula that when the linear data is plugged in, it will produce the wave data?

Example
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20
1,2,3,4,5,6,5,4,3, 2,_1,_2,_3,_4,_5,_6,_5,_4,_3,_2, etc.


Thanks for your time!:biggrin:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Depends on what you want the wave output to look like. At the simplest level, take the sine of the data (or take a * sin (bx) if you need different periods and amplitudes).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top