Can a Single Photon Carry All the Momentum in Electron-Positron Annihilation?

AI Thread Summary
Momentum conservation is essential in electron-positron annihilation, and it is not feasible for a single photon to carry all the momentum if the initial net momentum is non-zero. The energy-to-momentum ratio of a photon is constant (E/p = c), while the electron-positron pair has a different ratio due to their rest mass and kinetic energy. Calculating the energy of the pair involves their rest mass energy and kinetic energy, while momentum is determined using p = mv sin(theta). In the center of mass frame, the net momentum of the electron-positron pair is zero, leading to the conclusion that the resulting photon(s) must also have no net momentum. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing particle interactions in quantum physics.
melonhead
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I understand that momentum before and after annihilation must be conserved. However, why isn't it possible to have a net momentum not equal to zero before hand, (ex. an electron and a positron traveling head on, but at different velocities) and then just have a single photon travel in the direction of that net momentum after annihilation?

Any insight would be greatly appreciated. We just barely touched on annihilation in class, and this was bugging me.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to conserve energy also. Since photons have no rest mass, a photon's energy and momentum are proportional. An electron and positron have a large ratio of energy to momentum than a single photon can possibly have.
 
So my question now is how would I go about proving that a single photon can't have a large enough E/p ratio?

What I was trying to do is show that the ratio for the electron-positron pair will never equal to the ratio for a single photon.

E/p of a photon is c, correct?

To calculate the Energy of the electron positron pair, do you simply use 2(mc^2+(1/2)mv^2)?

Is the momentum p=mvsin(theta) for each of the particles?

How does relativity factor into all of this?
 
Last edited:
In the center of mass frame, the electron and positron have no net momentum, so the resulting photon(s) will have no net momentum either.
 
What exactly is the centre of mass frame? Is the net momentum in the centre of mass frame equal to 0 in every annihilation reaction?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top