Can a Single Photon Carry All the Momentum in Electron-Positron Annihilation?

AI Thread Summary
Momentum conservation is essential in electron-positron annihilation, and it is not feasible for a single photon to carry all the momentum if the initial net momentum is non-zero. The energy-to-momentum ratio of a photon is constant (E/p = c), while the electron-positron pair has a different ratio due to their rest mass and kinetic energy. Calculating the energy of the pair involves their rest mass energy and kinetic energy, while momentum is determined using p = mv sin(theta). In the center of mass frame, the net momentum of the electron-positron pair is zero, leading to the conclusion that the resulting photon(s) must also have no net momentum. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing particle interactions in quantum physics.
melonhead
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I understand that momentum before and after annihilation must be conserved. However, why isn't it possible to have a net momentum not equal to zero before hand, (ex. an electron and a positron traveling head on, but at different velocities) and then just have a single photon travel in the direction of that net momentum after annihilation?

Any insight would be greatly appreciated. We just barely touched on annihilation in class, and this was bugging me.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to conserve energy also. Since photons have no rest mass, a photon's energy and momentum are proportional. An electron and positron have a large ratio of energy to momentum than a single photon can possibly have.
 
So my question now is how would I go about proving that a single photon can't have a large enough E/p ratio?

What I was trying to do is show that the ratio for the electron-positron pair will never equal to the ratio for a single photon.

E/p of a photon is c, correct?

To calculate the Energy of the electron positron pair, do you simply use 2(mc^2+(1/2)mv^2)?

Is the momentum p=mvsin(theta) for each of the particles?

How does relativity factor into all of this?
 
Last edited:
In the center of mass frame, the electron and positron have no net momentum, so the resulting photon(s) will have no net momentum either.
 
What exactly is the centre of mass frame? Is the net momentum in the centre of mass frame equal to 0 in every annihilation reaction?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top