Can a spaceship be powered solely by solar energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mayed Al-Tunaiji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket Ship
AI Thread Summary
Powering a spaceship solely with solar energy presents significant challenges due to the immense energy requirements for space travel, such as a moon mission needing around 1 terajoule of energy. The solar constant is approximately 1 kW/m2, necessitating vast areas of solar panels, which would add considerable weight and complexity to the spacecraft. While solar-powered spacecraft exist, they are not viable for short trips like those to the moon due to their low power-to-weight ratios. Current technology requires additional propulsion methods, such as nuclear reactors, to achieve practical space travel. Overall, while solar energy has potential for long-duration missions, it is not currently feasible for rapid trips to the moon.
Mayed Al-Tunaiji
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
Hello, PF. So I was wondering if it's possible to power a spaceship by solar power only. If so how big will the solar panels be? Where would they be installed? How long will it take for them to fully charge in order to travel a certain distance? between Earth and the moon for instance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mayed Al-Tunaiji said:
Building such a rocket could revolutionize space exploration since the mass will be reduced significantly along with the cost of building a spacecraft .

That's an unfounded claim.

A moon shot takes in the ballpark of 1 TJ of energy. The solar constant is in the ballpark of 1 kW/m2. So you need acres upon acres of solar panels. Which you then have to lift, which requires more energy, which requires more solar panels, and so on and so on.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
That's an unfounded claim.

A moon shot takes in the ballpark of 1 TJ of energy. The solar constant is in the ballpark of 1 kW/m2. So you need acres upon acres of solar panels. Which you then have to lift, which requires more energy, which requires more solar panels, and so on and so on.
Sorry but I thought that using renewable energy is going to increase the efficiency of the rocket.
 
Mayed Al-Tunaiji said:
Sorry but I thought that using renewable energy is going to increase the efficiency of the rocket.
No, "efficiency" is not a relevant concept when discussing different energy sources and wasn't what you posited anyway: you speculated about COST, making the classic solar energy mistake that assuming since the source energy is free that the total lifetime cost of the system will be lower. It doesn't follow...and the cost follows the weight issue. So you're basically assuming that solar panels are approximately free and weigh approximately nothing.

In any case, such spacecraft do exist on a weaker scale: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawn_( spacecraft )

They have high propulsive efficiency, but low power to weight ratios, so they are never going to be viable for a trip to the moon. For very long trips they collect a lot of energy, which is where they provide a lot of benefit.
 
First you would need some form of electrical propulsion which currently isn't very practical. You would also still need fuel to get into orbit. A nuclear reactor would probably be more practical given you have a good source of propulsion that only uses electricity.
 
Proposals like in the Asteroid Retrieval Feasibility Study by Keck Institute for Space Studies are based on solar powered propulsion but it sounds like a case of "if or when someone else does the development work".
 
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'
Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...
Back
Top