Can Ampere's Law Still Apply When Whole Solenoid Is Enclosed?

AI Thread Summary
Ampere's Law can still be applied to a rectangle enclosing a whole solenoid because it depends on the total current enclosed by the Amperian surface. When the rectangle encloses the entire solenoid, the magnetic field outside is ideally zero, leading to integrals of the sides being zero. However, since the current enclosed is non-zero, it contributes to the magnetic field inside the solenoid, allowing the law to hold true. The confusion arises from the cancellation of currents on opposite sides of the rectangle, but the net enclosed current is what matters. Thus, Ampere's Law remains valid as long as the total current is considered, regardless of the rectangle's orientation.
n77ler
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to know why Ampere's Law can sitll be applied/valid if the Amperian surface is drawn as a rectangle which encloses a whole solenoid. Normally the rectangle would just include one side of the solenoid.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



When only one side of the solenoid is enclosed, Ampere's Law will work because B and ds will be parallel on the side of the rectangle which is inside the solenoid so we can intergrate this to an non-zero value. But I'm confused about when the whole solenoid is enclosed by the rectangle. It is an ideal solenoid so there should be no magnetic field outside the solenoid so the integral of the 2 sides which are parallel to B will be 0. The other two sides are perpendicular to B so they will also = 0. The only reason I can think that Ampere's Law still applies is that all of the current is enclosed so that somehow helps with the solution?

I'm really stuck here, because I keep getting the left side of the equation =0 so I cannot see how the law is still valid.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Remember that current has a direction. You have to consider not only how much current goes through the rectangle, but in which direction it goes through.
 
But I thought it only depended on the direction of B and ds for the left side of the laW?
 
So the current travels in opposite directions on opposite sides of the rectangle and therefore the current will cancel out? So when we evaluate each side of the rectangle with the intergral involving B and ds we are supposed to get 0 because the right side of the equation is also supposed to equal zero?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top