Can anyone provide simplified derivations for equations of kinematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rohannet
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Simplified derivations for the equations of kinematics are requested, specifically for v=u+at, s=ut+1/2at², v²-u²=2as, and Dn=u+a/2(2n-1). The original poster is in Class XI and struggles with calculus, seeking easier explanations. A suggestion is made to refer to textbooks for these derivations, and a link to HyperPhysics is provided for additional resources. The poster acknowledges the textbook content but expresses difficulty in understanding it. Clear and simplified explanations are essential for grasping these fundamental kinematic equations.
rohannet
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I AM CURRENTLY STUDYING IN CLASS XI AND I DON'T KNOW MUCH ABOUT CALCULUS.
SO CAN ANYBODY GIVE EASY DERIVATIONS OF EQUATIONS OF KINEMATICS
1)v=u+at
2)s=ut+1/2at2
3)v2-u
PHP:
2
=2as
4)Dn=u+a/2(2n-1)

THANKS IN ADVANCE
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thank u for Ur effort
i know that its all in my textbook
but that too i don't understand.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top