Can Bob measure heat flow and entropy on a glacier using a metal rod experiment?

AI Thread Summary
Bob's experiment involves a two-part metal rod made of silver and lead, aimed at measuring heat flow and entropy on a glacier. The setup includes a boiling water pot and a glacier hole, achieving thermodynamic equilibrium with the right end at 0.00°C. Key calculations include heat flow per second through the rod, the temperature at the interface between the rods, and the entropy changes for both the teapot and the glacier. The relevant equation for entropy is S = Q/T, but the discussion raises questions about the availability of the conduction coefficients for silver and lead. This experiment serves to illustrate the principles of thermodynamics in a practical setting.
TungYee32
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Bob who is working on a glacier wants to experiment with heat and has constructed a two part metal rod. The left rod is silver and has length L1 = .5454 M, and has a cross sectional area A = 3.1416 CM^2. It is joined end to end with a lead rod of identical diameter and length L2 = .3554 M. Bob has insulated the curved surface, placed the left end in a pot of boiling water and the right end in a hole in the glacier. After thermodynamic equilibrium has been achieved, there is a puddle of water in the glacier and the assumption that the right end is at a temperature T1 = 0.00 deg C.

1) Calculate the heat flow per second through the rod.
2) Calculate the temperature, T2, at the interface between the two rods.
3) Calculate the change in entropy of the teapot in one second.
4) Calculate the change in entropy of the glacier in one second.
5) Calculate the change in entropy of the universe in one second.

Homework Equations



S = Q/T


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
show what ur attempt...
 
values of conduction coefficient of silver and lead are provided or not?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
20K
Replies
5
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Back
Top