Can Calculating a Horse's Leg Spring Constant Predict Jump Heights?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating a horse's leg spring constant to predict jump heights by using potential energy equations. The student plans to measure leg displacement and force to determine the spring constant, but there are concerns about the accuracy of the formulas being used. Key points include the need to clarify the relationship between force, displacement, and the jump height, as well as ensuring that units are consistently applied throughout the calculations. There is also a suggestion to focus on potential energy directly related to jump height rather than complicating the model with unnecessary variables. Ultimately, the goal is to accurately determine how the horse's leg mechanics contribute to its jumping ability.
Liz Hoyt
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Science fair help needed! Horses use the energy stored in their tendons to help propel them over a jump- much like a spring. By determining the spring constant for the leg, the student wants to then calculate the potential energy stored in that leg. Would this work? From her research proposal:
I will use the equation, PE=1/2kx² to find the potential energy the leg stores (where k=spring constant, x=spring displacement). X will be found by measuring the smallest distance between the two measuring points when the horse has both feet on the ground and subtracting from equilibrium. k can be solved for by using the equation; k= (x-x₁)/F. x being the displaced length, x₁ being leg at equilibrium and F equaling force. The values I will be using for that equation will be x equaling leg being stood on, x₁ relaxed leg, F being force on standing leg. To find force I will take the Weight of horse in kg then to find force on one leg, multiply by .55 (for forelimbs) or .45 (hindlimbs) then divide by two.
Does this make sense? The difference (x) between a leg at rest and under weight is 0.025m, Force is 1225N so spring constant is 0.00002041? This makes for a very small value for PE too?
I should include that I a biology teacher that is taking students to a state science fair. My background in physics is limited and the student is asking for help so I am seeking help on her behalf. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not exactly sure what you did here. You were dealing with the potential energy of the spring, and then changed to the Hooke's law force.

If you are making a model of this via a simple spring problem, then I think there might be a few mistakes here. Here's what you need:

1. Get a value for the mass of a horse (in kg).
2. Figure out how high the horse needs to jump (in meters).
3. From 1 and 2, using PE = mgh, this is the minimum energy that you need to store in your spring (in Joules).
4. You know how much the horse's leg bends (your "displaced" length), (in meters).
5. Then, using the PE equation that you wrote, you have everything to calculate the spring constant.

You should never lose sight that these have units (something I often tell my students ad nauseum), even the spring constant. It is difficult to diagnose what went wrong with your description because you never included any units. We can't tell if you used the right ones, or if you mixed-and-matched different ones.

Zz.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Liz Hoyt
ZapperZ said:
I'm not exactly sure what you did here. You were dealing with the potential energy of the spring, and then changed to the Hooke's law force.

If you are making a model of this via a simple spring problem, then I think there might be a few mistakes here. Here's what you need:

1. Get a value for the mass of a horse (in kg).
2. Figure out how high the horse needs to jump (in meters).
3. From 1 and 2, using PE = mgh, this is the minimum energy that you need to store in your spring (in Joules).
4. You know how much the horse's leg bends (your "displaced" length), (in meters).
5. Then, using the PE equation that you wrote, you have everything to calculate the spring constant.

You should never lose sight that these have units (something I often tell my students ad nauseum), even the spring constant. It is difficult to diagnose what went wrong with your description because you never included any units. We can't tell if you used the right ones, or if you mixed-and-matched different ones.

Zz.
She was hoping to determine the spring constant in the leg and then use that to determine the potential energy in that leg. I think that she has her formula for k incorrect though. It should be k=F/x with x being the displacement.
 
Liz Hoyt said:
She was hoping to determine the spring constant in the leg and then use that to determine the potential energy in that leg. I think that she has her formula for k incorrect though. It should be k=F/x with x being the displacement.

But think about it. Your "F" is nothing more than the weight of the horse. It ends up being a constant, no matter how high the horse has to jump, because your "equation" doesn't take this into account. The "x" is the displacement of the "spring", i.e. the horse's leg/muscles since you are modeling it as a spring. This is not the height it has to jump. So, does the fact that your F remains constant, no matter how high the horse has to jump, makes any sense to you?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
But think about it. Your "F" is nothing more than the weight of the horse. It ends up being a constant, no matter how high the horse has to jump, because your "equation" doesn't take this into account. The "x" is the displacement of the "spring", i.e. the horse's leg/muscles since you are modeling it as a spring. This is not the height it has to jump. So, does the fact that your F remains constant, no matter how high the horse has to jump, makes any sense to you?

Zz.

Lets not consider the jump yet. If we are looking at determining the spring constant k, the force on the spring and the displacement are proportional. If we increase the force, we increase the displacement on the spring (x), right? In determining k, can't we use the displacement between a leg at rest (non-weight bearing) and the leg under the force of its weight. The difference in x (and there is one) is a result of the force of the horse's weight. We aren't even looking at the jump yet. Once she knows the spring constant, can she use the spring constant and the changes in displacement that occur as you alter jump height to determine the PE? Can't she look at the Potential Energy by measuring the varying displacements that occur as she alters jump height? Let's say the displacement on the spring is 0.05m for a 2' jump and 0.08 for a 4' jump. Knowing the spring constant is constant, and by measuring displacement, can she use PE = 1/2 k * x squared to determine how the horse compresses the spring in his tendons to handle varying jump heights?
and thank you ZapperZ for taking the time to allow me to hash this out with you! I really am appreciating this!
 
Liz Hoyt said:
Lets not consider the jump yet. If we are looking at determining the spring constant k, the force on the spring and the displacement are proportional. If we increase the force, we increase the displacement on the spring (x), right? In determining k, can't we use the displacement between a leg at rest (non-weight bearing) and the leg under the force of its weight. The difference in x (and there is one) is a result of the force of the horse's weight. We aren't even looking at the jump yet. Once she knows the spring constant, can she use the spring constant and the changes in displacement that occur as you alter jump height to determine the PE? Can't she look at the Potential Energy by measuring the varying displacements that occur as she alters jump height? Let's say the displacement on the spring is 0.05m for a 2' jump and 0.08 for a 4' jump. Knowing the spring constant is constant, and by measuring displacement, can she use PE = 1/2 k * x squared to determine how the horse compresses the spring in his tendons to handle varying jump heights?

I don't understand. What ULTIMATELY is to be determined here? The "spring constant", or the height that the horse can jump? I.e. what are the given or known variables?

I read your first post, and I get the impression that you know the height that the horse has to jump, or can jump, and so you want to find the spring constant, i.e. what is essentially the property of the horse's muscle. If I'm right in my interpretation, than using the Hooke's law force is "working too hard" (to paraphrase Mary Boas from the book). Sticking only with the potential energy will be sufficient, as I've outlined in my post.

If not, then you have to explain clearly what exactly is being calculated or estimated here.

Zz.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top