Can complex numbers be used to show a pattern in exponents?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the problem of determining when the expression (1 - √3i)ⁿ is real and positive, and whether the corresponding values of n form an arithmetic progression. Participants clarify that the problem requires identifying specific values of n rather than all natural numbers. It is suggested that using polar form and de Moivre's Theorem can simplify the analysis of the powers of the complex number. The conversation highlights a misunderstanding of the problem's wording, with some participants feeling it could be clearer. Ultimately, the consensus is that the values of n that satisfy the condition do indeed form an arithmetic progression.
icystrike
Messages
444
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Given that (1-\sqrt{3}i)^{n} is real and positive , use de Moivre's Theorem to show that the values of n are terms of arithmetic progression.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've worked it out . n=3k s.t k element of positive integers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you have given us the problem exactly as stated? My guess is that they're asking you to show that the values of (1 - sqrt(3)i)n are terms of an arithmetic progression. As you've stated the problem it doesn't make much sense.
 
Mark44 said:
Are you sure you have given us the problem exactly as stated? My guess is that they're asking you to show that the values of (1 - sqrt(3)i)n are terms of an arithmetic progression. As you've stated the problem it doesn't make much sense.

Hi Mark! I've checked with the question again , and its exactly what I've stated.
 
OK - just checking. Apparently the problem asks you to find which values of n are such that (1 - sqrt(3)i)^n are real and positive. What is 1 - sqrt(3)i in polar form? That should help you figure out a lot more easily what the powers of 1 - sqrt(3)i look like.
 
Mark44 said:
OK - just checking. Apparently the problem asks you to find which values of n are such that (1 - sqrt(3)i)^n are real and positive. What is 1 - sqrt(3)i in polar form? That should help you figure out a lot more easily what the powers of 1 - sqrt(3)i look like.

yeap. I've worked it out in my attempted solution and I'm convinced that it is a arithmetic progression as n has 0 as first term and 3 as common difference for each term.
 
Not quite.

The question is asking for when it's real and positive. Since 2n is always positive for natural n, then you are searching for when the complex part has an argument of 0. i.e. \theta=2k\pi where k is all integers.

You can even see for yourself that for n=3 the value of \left(1-\sqrt{3}i\right)^3 is real, but negative.
 
icystrike said:
yeap. I've worked it out in my attempted solution and I'm convinced that it is a arithmetic progression as n has 0 as first term and 3 as common difference for each term.
You still don't understand what Mark44 was asking.

In your original post, you gave a complex number to the "n" power and asked to "show that the values of n are terms of arithmetic progression."

Well, that's trivial! The values of n are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ..., with common difference 1!
 
HallsofIvy said:
You still don't understand what Mark44 was asking.

In your original post, you gave a complex number to the "n" power and asked to "show that the values of n are terms of arithmetic progression."

Well, that's trivial! The values of n are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ..., with common difference 1!
1, 2, 3, ... don't work in the problem as I understand it. IMO the problem is poorly stated and misleading. A better restatement of the problem might be "For what n is the expression (1 - sqrt(3)i)n real and positive? Show that these values of n form an arithmetic progression."
 
I believe the question was clear enough. It first mentions that (1-\sqrt{3})^n is real and positive, which obviously indicates that n is not all natural numbers. Then it goes on to say show that the values of n are in arithmetic progression.
Shouldn't be confusing whatsoever in my opinion.
 
  • #10
I still maintain that the problem could have been clearer if rephrased. "Given that (1 - i*sqrt(3))^n is real and positive, ..." would cause one to reasonably infer that this statement was true for integer values of n, or possibly just nonnegative integer values.
 
  • #11
Mark44 said:
would cause one to reasonably infer that this statement was true for integer values of n

Maybe for someone without a basic knowledge of complex numbers and exponentials, but this is untrue for everyone that has posted in this thread.

Also, I believe that realizing the base case of natural numbers n=1 contradicts the statement that (1-i\sqrt{3})^n is real and positive would be easier than having to make some reasonable judgement on what the question is saying.

... I stand by my statement that it's obvious what the question was asking.
 
  • #12
Ah, thanks to both Mark44 and Mentallic. I completely misunderstood the problem. It might be better phrased "show that those n such that (1- i\sqrt{3})^n are real and positive form an arithmetic progression".
 
  • #13
Mentallic said:
Maybe for someone without a basic knowledge of complex numbers and exponentials, but this is untrue for everyone that has posted in this thread.

Also, I believe that realizing the base case of natural numbers n=1 contradicts the statement that (1-i\sqrt{3})^n is real and positive would be easier than having to make some reasonable judgement on what the question is saying.

... I stand by my statement that it's obvious what the question was asking.



HallsOfIvy said:
Ah, thanks to both Mark44 and Mentallic. I completely misunderstood the problem. It might be better phrased "show that those n such that (1- i\sqrt{3})^n are real and positive form an arithmetic progression".

I rest my case.:biggrin:
 
  • #14
HallsofIvy said:
Ah, thanks to both Mark44 and Mentallic. I completely misunderstood the problem. It might be better phrased "show that those n such that (1- i\sqrt{3})^n are real and positive form an arithmetic progression".
Mentallic said:
Mark44 said:
would cause one to reasonably infer that this statement was true for integer values of n
Maybe for someone without a basic knowledge of complex numbers and exponentials, but this is untrue for everyone that has posted in this thread.
I guess I was wrong...

Haha just kidding :wink:
 
Back
Top