Can Cosine or Sine Values be Expressed Using Roots of Rationals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gonzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots
gonzo
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
This is indirectly related to issues with cyclotomic polynomials and glaois groups.

Is there some easy way to know if you are dealing with a cos or sin that is expressable in terms of roots of rationals? Like \pi/3 for example? If so, is there any straightforward way of figuring it out?

I'm asking because I'm trying to do a problem involving the galois group for the 7th roots of unity. The fact that there is a order 2 and order 3 subgroup of the galois group makes me think that Q(i) must be a fixed field and then some cube root another one for the subgroups. This would further imply that cos(4\pi/7) is expressable as a ratioal function plus a cube root (unless I'm way off in space, which is possible).

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A very interesting problem. I'm not very fluent with Galois theory these days, so please take my words with a grain of salt.

For the 7th roots of unity we have the polynomial

(x-1)^7 \quad = \quad (x-1)(x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1)

So the interesting polynomial for these roots is:

p \quad = \quad x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1

Now, it is obvious that this polynomial has as Galois group \mathbb{Z}_7. If we call \omega some seventh root of unity (not 1), the other roots of p are the powers \omega^k,\, k=2,\ldots, 6. Hence the field for this polynomial is \mathbb{Q}(\omega), extension of dimension 7 over \mathbb{Q}, and its automorphisms are obviously the powers of the roots.

The group \mathbb{Z}_7 has no nontrivial subgroups. I think you are erroneously taking \mathbb{Z}_6 as the Galois group of the polynomial p.

Anyway, we come to the conclusion that any root of our polynomial p has the form a_0 + a_1\omega + a_2\omega^2 + a_3\omega^3 + a_4\omega^4 + a_5\omega^5 + a_6\omega^6, where the a_i are rationals. Since \omega is a radical (a seventh root of unity), this trivially means that all the roots of p are radicals.

However, I think that in order to get better information on the structure of the roots, the coefficients a_i, etc., you could try reading modern elaborations of Gauss' works on cyclotomic groups. I hope this link helps : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_period

----

If you take sixth roots of unity, you have \mathbb{Z}_6 \cong \mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_2, so the Galois group should be generated by two radicals \mathbb{Q}(i,\xi), with \xi^3 = 1.

This means that the sixth roots of unity should be writeable in the form: a_0 + a_1 i + a_2 \xi + a_3 i\xi + a_4\xi^2 + a_5i\xi^2. Again, more finese in the form of these roots should be achieved turning to Gauss' works.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top