MHB Can Different Bases Change the Classification of Lie Algebras?

topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
This is only a minor question.

I watched an on-line video recently on su2 and how it applies to Physics. Now, one of the first things the instructor did was to change the base to sl2. Fine and all, but she called sl2 "su2" for the whole video. Since the two Lie algebras have different structure factors how can she do this? Or was she just being a Physicist and sloppy about it?

Another example. My text is talking about the Cartan-Weyl basis of sl3, then changes the basis to a Chevalley basis. The problem here is not merely that the structure factors are different but now the simply laced root system for the Cartan basis is no longer simply laced in the Chevalley basis. And yet the text still refers to it as sl3.

What gives?

-Dan
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top