Can Electromagnetic Waves Efficiently Heat Metals Over Long Distances?

AI Thread Summary
Using electromagnetic waves to heat metals like copper over long distances, such as 1km, is theoretically possible but not practical due to significant power loss. The energy transmitted falls off rapidly with distance, making it inefficient; even a strong transmitter would yield only microWatts at that range. While inductive heating and focused solar radiation can heat metals effectively, these methods require close proximity or specific setups. Additionally, radar technology demonstrates that while metal reflects microwave energy, it does not absorb enough to generate significant heat without specialized materials. Overall, achieving effective heating of metals at such distances remains unfeasible.
ANarwhal
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Is it possible (and practical) to use electromagnetic waves to heat copper (or other metals such as iron, steel or an aluminium alloy) over long distances (such as 1km)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
possible maybe with a million Megawatt or so transmitter
practical no.

how hot did you want to heat it ?
The transmitted energy in a radio signal falls off with the inverse sqr law
so even for a 100W transmitter the power level at a few 100 metres is microWatts

cheers
Dave
 
It wern't half hot when I got in my car this afternoon:cool:
 
ANarwhal said:
Is it possible (and practical) to use electromagnetic waves to heat copper (or other metals such as iron, steel or an aluminium alloy) over long distances (such as 1km)?

Sure, it's easy.

Just use your cell phone... :smile:
 
The air force developed a 747 with a laser that would have been used to shoot down launching ballistic missiles by heating them until they failed. It had a range of something like 200 miles.The program was canceled recently though due to the high cost and limited practicality.
 
At a distance of 1km, I should have thought a good quality mirror with a big enough area (a bit over 1msq for every kW you want) could focus a reasonable amount of solar radiation to 'warm up', if not 'heat up' a copper target. the optics wouldn't be too demanding but you'd need good tracking.
What would be the actual scenario?

btw, the airborne laser was a chemical laser. Much more efficient than an electrical one and weight is very relevant.
 
The question is very vague and puzzling. I mean, leave a piece of metal out in the sun and voila! It gets hot! All thanks to electromagnetic waves. So what is the mystery here?

Zz.
 
Inductance heaters can take a block of metal and get it red hot within seconds. Build a giant inductor and maybe it will work!
 
I am wondering if there is a certain frequency I can use that would heat up copper efficiently (similar to how water molecules react to microwaves with dielectric heating).
 
  • #10
ANarwhal said:
I am wondering if there is a certain frequency I can use that would heat up copper efficiently (similar to how water molecules react to microwaves with dielectric heating).

ANarwhal, will you please reaffirm if your question includes the requirement of the heating be done over at distance of one km, as in your opening post?

What experiment/process are you asking about? The more specific you are, the more accurately members may form a useful response. The more vague your description is, and the more speculation over your intentions, the less meaningful responses can be made.
Thank you,
Bobbywhy
 
  • #11
I can affirm that my question does include the initial requirement. I'd also like to add that I am open to using directional antennas in this hypothetical.
 
  • #12
ANarwhal said:
Is it possible (and practical) to use electromagnetic waves to heat copper (or other metals such as iron, steel or an aluminium alloy) over long distances (such as 1km)?

Your proposed experiment is to heat some metal such as copper at one kilometer’s distance using microwaves.

Radar is used to detect distant targets by transmitting microwave energy outwards, the target reflecting some of that energy back towards the radar set. Then it is received and detected. Materials such as metal are strongly radar reflective and tend to produce strong return signals. Even though the peak pulse power transmitted may be very high, the intensity falls off with the square of the distance. So you may expect microwatts (really tiny quantities of power) striking the target, and even smaller quantities being reflected back, and maybe, if you’re lucky, enough power to be detected in the receiver.

Reflecting energy means incident energy is not absorbed. In order to absorb energy one needs to coat the metal with radar absorbent material. The SR-71 Blackbird and other planes were painted with a special "iron ball paint". This consisted of small metallic-coated balls. Radar energy is converted to heat rather than being reflected.

With radar absorbent material (RAM), it can be used in the original construction, or as an addition to highly reflective surfaces. There are at least three types of RAM: resonant, non-resonant magnetic and non-resonant large volume. Because the non-resonant RAM dissipates incident radar energy over a larger surface area, it usually results in a trivial increase in surface temperature, thus reducing Radar Cross Section without an increase in infrared signature.

Short answer, NO, you cannot expect to heat up chunks of copper metal at one kilometer’s distance using microwaves. No way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar_cross-section
 
  • #13
ANarwhal said:
I am wondering if there is a certain frequency I can use that would heat up copper efficiently (similar to how water molecules react to microwaves with dielectric heating).

This still doesn't explain much, and you have not addressed the simple, basic, and obvious example that I had given. What is the problem with that example?

Many materials, including copper, have such a broadband absorption, unlike molecules which can have narrower absorption. So I am not sure what you are trying to get at here.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top