Can Fluids Flow from Low Pressure to High Pressure?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of whether fluids can flow from low pressure to high pressure, focusing on natural, unconstrained flows of water and air. Participants explore various examples and theoretical considerations related to this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that fluids can flow from low pressure to high pressure, citing common observations of this phenomenon.
  • One participant questions the feasibility of unconstrained flows, asking if any geophysical flows meet this criterion.
  • Another participant suggests that the concept of pressure must be clarified, indicating that examples can be provided using Bernoulli's equation.
  • Examples of natural flows against pressure gradients include atmospheric and oceanic circulations, such as the Gulf Stream and Föhn winds.
  • A participant describes the spring and fall overturn in lakes as an example where water flows against the pressure gradient, noting the increase in pressure at the lake bottom.
  • Concerns are raised about the need for examples to initiate discussion, with one participant suggesting that it would be more engaging to provide personal examples rather than waiting for others to contribute.
  • There is a mention of buoyancy effects, where less dense water rises while denser water sinks, which may complicate the understanding of pressure gradients.
  • Another participant notes that any time flow slows down, an adverse pressure gradient tends to occur.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the ability of fluids to flow from low pressure to high pressure, with no consensus reached on the validity of specific examples or the conditions under which such flows occur.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations in the discussion include the ambiguity surrounding the definition of pressure, the constraints of the proposed examples, and the reliance on specific conditions for the flows being discussed.

klimatos
Messages
412
Reaction score
36
I maintain that not only they can, but that observations illustrating the phenomena are common.

To keep the thread from fragmenting too badly, I should like to propose the following rules of discussion:

1) Liquids shall be limited to water and air.

2) Only natural flows may be offered. Nothing initiated, modified, or influenced by man or his works.

3) The flows must be unconstrained: no channels, pipes, or containers.

4) A flow from low pressure to high pressure shall be deemed to have occurred if the internal pressure (as measured by an imaginary manometer at the midpoint of the parcel of fluid) is higher at the finish of the flow than it was at the beginning.

5) Acceptable evidence shall consist of scientifically-accepted citations and/or compelling argument.

What are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


klimatos said:
3) The flows must be unconstrained: no channels, pipes, or containers.
This one might be problematic. Are there unconstrained geophysical flows?
 


Well it really depends what you mean by 'pressure' in the fluid.

However in principle it's simple to offer examples where fluid flows from lower pressure to higher, simply by exploiting the gravity head component of Bernoulli's equation.

go well
 


Any atmospheric or ocean circulation where air/water descends. Gulfstream sinking in arctic seas. Föhn winds. High pressure weather area.
 


klimatos said:
I maintain that not only they can, but that observations illustrating the phenomena are common.

To keep the thread from fragmenting too badly, I should like to propose the following rules of discussion:

1) Liquids shall be limited to water and air.

2) Only natural flows may be offered. Nothing initiated, modified, or influenced by man or his works.

3) The flows must be unconstrained: no channels, pipes, or containers.

4) A flow from low pressure to high pressure shall be deemed to have occurred if the internal pressure (as measured by an imaginary manometer at the midpoint of the parcel of fluid) is higher at the finish of the flow than it was at the beginning.

5) Acceptable evidence shall consist of scientifically-accepted citations and/or compelling argument.

What are your thoughts?

As for 1): Did you mean FLUIDS shall be limited to water and air?
 


Assuming by flow you mean velocity, then due to momentum, this can happen. Pressure gradients only result in accelerations or declerations, not instantaneous changes in velocity.
 


Bobbywhy said:
As for 1): Did you mean FLUIDS shall be limited to water and air?

Of course, my stupid!
 


An excellent example of fluids flowing against the pressure gradient may be found in the field of limnology. In those parts of the world where lakes freeze over in the winter, the phenomena of spring and fall overturn occurs.

In the Fall, surface waters cool until the temperature of maximum water density occurs (about 3.94°C). At that time, portions of the surface water will sink through the underlying water until they reach the lake bottom. During that passage, the parcels of water move steadily against the pressure gradient. The pressure at the midpoint of the parcel when it reaches the bottom is substantially higher than when it started at the surface. Hence, there has been a natural flow of water against the pressure gradient.

This process repeats itself in the Spring.
 
Hang on a mo:
I maintain that not only they can, but that observations illustrating the phenomena are common.
...
What are your thoughts?
... what? Without supplying your own?
If your intention is to produce a discussion topic as in a social network, then isn't it more polite to start the ball rolling yourself with a bunch of your own examples instead of waiting until post #8?

An excellent example of fluids flowing against the pressure gradient may be found in the field of limnology. In those parts of the world where lakes freeze over in the winter, the phenomena of spring and fall overturn occurs.
... there is also a corresponding flow of water from the high-pressure zone to the low pressure one. This is a buoyancy effect - we'd normally think of it as the less dense water floats to the surface, dragging the more dense water down (to avoid a gap).

Cold air falls as hot air rises.
A water globule can fall from a tap into a full sink, and drop below the surface. Larger scale for waterfalls.
A big river flows into the sea - at the sea, part of the river water flows under the surface for a while. But that may not count as the water-center loses pressure.
A weighted bladder containing air is dropped into the sea and sinks ... the air is moving against the pressure gradient... but it's constrained isn't it?

I think you'll find that each time something flows naturally against the pressure gradient, something else has to go the other way.
 
  • #10
Alternatively, any time the flow is slowing down, you'll tend to get an adverse pressure gradient.
 
  • #11
You are certainly correct, Simon, but this thread definitely did not need to be resurrected. Locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 160 ·
6
Replies
160
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K