Can I Calculate Satellite Dish Curvature for a Specific Radio Wavelength?

AI Thread Summary
The curvature of a satellite dish, or parabolic antenna, is not determined by the radio wavelength but rather by its design to focus signals at a specific focal point. The diameter of the dish significantly impacts its gain at different frequencies, with larger dishes providing better gain at higher frequencies. For example, a 2-meter dish will have much higher gain at 10 GHz compared to 5 GHz, and very low gain at 144 MHz. Understanding these principles is crucial for optimizing satellite dish performance. Overall, the relationship between dish size, curvature, and frequency is key to effective signal reception.
Lord_Segan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How can I mathematically determine curvature for a satellite dish for a specific radio wavelength?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It has nothing to do with the wavelength. And the fact that they are actually called parabolic antennas should give you a clue as to their curvature ;)
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
As DrClaude said it isn't frequency related
The curvature amount determines the focal point location
eg.
http://www.satsig.net/focal-length-parabolic-dish.htm

EDIT:
The physical size --- diameter of the dish will affect the gain at a given wavelength ( frequency)
eg say a dish of 2 metres diameter is going to have much more gain at 10 GHz (3cm wavelength) than it is at 5GHz ( 6cm wavelength)

that 2 metre dish is going to have very low gain at 144MHz ( 2 metre wavelength) and even worse as the wavelength becomes significantly larger than the size of the dishcheers
Dave
 
OK, thank you.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
64
Views
9K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top