Can I Solve This Massive Pulley Problem Without Using Energies?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a pulley problem without using energy concepts. The user derived an equation involving tension and the pulley’s angular acceleration but is unsure about the mass of the pulley. Participants suggest that the mass can be treated as a variable and that the problem can be solved without energy considerations. It is clarified that understanding the type of motion for the masses involved is crucial for determining acceleration. Ultimately, while energy can be used to find the disk mass, it is not necessary for the initial steps of the problem.
isukatphysics69
Messages
453
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


iamsoscrewed.PNG


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


ok so i have derived the equation

T2-T1 = .5MPULLEY*atangential
and stopped here because i am missing the mass of the pulley. now since the equation gives a velocity i was thinking to use energy, is this the correct approach?
 

Attachments

  • iamsoscrewed.PNG
    iamsoscrewed.PNG
    8.3 KB · Views: 923
Physics news on Phys.org
isukatphysics69 said:
so i have derived the equation
That is very nifty (and probably correcet), but I don't see it if you don't post your working. Especially since you start out from zero relevant equations !
isukatphysics69 said:
stopped here because i am missing the mass of the pulley
Call it ##M_P## and proceed. Perhaps it divides out :rolleyes:
 
isukatphysics69 said:
and stopped here because i am missing the mass of the pulley.
You can just keep working with Mpulley. But you don't even have to do it.

What is the type of motion mass 2 will make? Do you have to consider details of the pulley system to find its acceleration?

Does the problem later ask to calculate the pulley disk mass? Because it is possible with the given information.
 
  • Like
Likes isukatphysics69
mfb said:
You can just keep working with Mpulley. But you don't even have to do it.

What is the type of motion mass 2 will make? Do you have to consider details of the pulley system to find its acceleration?

Does the problem later ask to calculate the pulley disk mass? Because it is possible with the given information.
Yes the problem later ask me to calculate the disk mass, it is 6:30am I was too tired to type out all of the work I am going to sleep right now but I'm curious why they have velocity I was wondering if I need to consider energy on this problem or not
 
You don't have to consider energies. You can use them to find the disk mass, but you can equally do everything without energies.

For the first step (acceleration) energies are not useful.
 
  • Like
Likes isukatphysics69
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top