Can Particle Pair Annihilation Produce Only One Photon?

Hells_Kitchen
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
1. Problem Statement What is the wavelength of each of the two photons produced when a particle pair of a positron and electron accelerated at 25GeV collide? Can the net result of this annihilation be only ONE single photon? Why or why Not?



Homework Equations


Etotal(initial) = Etotal(final)
Ptotal(initial)=Ptotal(final)
Qtotal(initial)=Qtotal(final)


3. My attempt to the solution has been based on the three conservation laws which I mathematically described above, i only need a confirmation if correct.

Etotal(initial) = E(e+) + E(e-)= [mc^2 + K+] + [mc^2 + K-] = 50GeV + 2mc^2 =50 GeV + 1.022 MeV =5.0001022 × 10^10 eV

Etotal(final) = hf_1 +h_f_2 = 2hf ==> f=6.0451*10^24 Hz; lambda=c/f =4.959*10^-17 meters

Each photon will have a wavelength of 4.959*10^-17 meters.


One photon cannot result from this particle annihilation because in this case momentum would not be conserved. Since momentum is a vector quantity and after the collision all that remains is energy which is scalar there is no reasonable way that the P_initial vector be conserved. When there are two or more photons the net resultant vector of all momenta from each photon must add to zero. (is this explanation plausiable ... is there any math that can be shown?) What happens if the net P_initial is zero? In this case the total initial momentum is probably zero since both particles are accelerated with the same energy and in opposite directions their velocity vectors sum adds to zero. Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are the last questions yours or are they part of the problem?

You could try using 4-vector (if you know them).
 
No. They're my questions, the answers of which I think are an attempt to better answer the "Why or Why Not" part of the problem.

It makes sense that the initial momentum before collision would be zero:
p_initial = mv/(1-v^2/c^2) \hat{x} + mv/(1-v^2/c^2) \hat{-x} = 0

p_final of the photon may be derived by Einstein's energy formula:

E = [(pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2]^0.5. Without any mass ONE photon would have momentum given by:
p = E/c which is non-zero therefore contradictory to p_initial and momentum would not be conserved if one photon were emitted.

This in turn raises another question: what is the direction of this momentum and why should two or more emitted photons conserve momentum while ONE would not?

P.S. Sorry. I don't know the 4-vector.
 
Your answer is correct and your reasoning is too.

You have to respect both energy and momentum conservation. Usually you go into a coordinate system that is easy to calculate, i.e. where the total initial momentum is zero. Then the final two photons will have momenta equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. One photon cannot satisfy this relation.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top