Can Right-Handed Neutrinos Be Integrated into the Standard Model?

lalo_u
Gold Member
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I am reading Mohapatra's book: "Massive Neutrinos in Physics and Astrophysics". At the beginning of chapter 7, it is sought expressions where the right neutrino was considered in the Electroweak Standard Model.
Everything was fine until I found the expression \overline{N^c_{l'L}}\nu^c_{lR}=\overline{\nu_{lL}}N_{l'R}.
Where N_{l'R} is the right handed field associated with right handed neutrinos and the subsctipts l,l' indicate the lepton flavors.

Well, I'm trying to prove this, but I get stuck on the following expression:

\overline{N^c_{l&#039;L}}\nu^c_{lR} =\overline{\left(N_{l&#039;L}\right)^c}\left(\nu_{lR}\right)^c<br /> = \overline{N_{l&#039;R}}\nu_{lL}
And I'm assuming that they are Majorana neutrinos.

To complete the test I should justify why the conjugate for the last expression can be taken and remain unchanged, someone could help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To prove the expression \overline{N^c_{l'L}}\nu^c_{lR}=\overline{\nu_{lL}}N_{l'R}, you can use the fact that Majorana particles are their own antiparticles. This means that the conjugate of a Majorana particle is equal to itself. Thus, taking the conjugate of the last expression will not change it: \overline{N_{l'R}}\nu_{lL} = \overline{\left(N_{l'R}\right)^c}\left(\nu_{lL}\right)^c = \overline{\nu_{lL}}N_{l'R}.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top