Can somebody rephrase this putnam problem for me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


http://math.stanford.edu/~vakil/putnam07/07putnam5.pdf

I am working on Problem 2.

Can someone rephrase that question for me? I do not see why you would be dividing anything in this problem.

The monovariant I found in Sample 3 was the sum of the difference between people in adjacent rooms. This number is bounded from above and monotonically increasing. The upper bound is the total number of people times the maximum number of rooms connected to anyone room.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Problem 2 says:
Solve sample 3 in a manner that makes use of the sum
\sum 1/(n_i + 1).​
 
Then I really have no idea. This must be completely different than the way I explained in the first post. I don't know what the n_i are and I still do not see where division would come in.

But wait. Let n_i be the number of people in room i. The reason you need to add 1 in the denominator is because a room might have 0 people. Now, when someone goes from room i_1 to room i_2, that sum changes by

1/(n_{i_1}}) - 1/(n_{i_1} +1)+ 1/(n_{i_2} +2) - 1/(n_{i_2}+1})

and it is easy to show that this sum is positive when n_j is greater than or equal to n_i

So that sum is monotonically increasing.

Thanks.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
2
Replies
86
Views
22K
Back
Top