Can someone explain this GRE problem to me? (gamma ray detector)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a GRE problem involving a gamma ray detector, where the original poster struggles to compute the area ratio between the detector's position at the end of a tube and further away. Participants emphasize the need for clear calculations and labeled diagrams to identify errors in the approach. Key points include the misunderstanding of solid angles and the relationship between the spherical cap area and the detector's position. The conversation escalates into a critique of the original poster's problem-solving methods, with warnings about the importance of clarity and organization in physics. Overall, the thread highlights the necessity of structured problem-solving techniques for success in graduate-level physics.
jdou86
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
OP warned about not providing an attempt at a solution.
Screen Shot 2019-09-02 at 8.12.12 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How far did you get on this problem?
 
not far at all i was trying to compute the area raito btwn when it is at the end of the tube and far away. but my answer comes nothing close to the choices below
 
You'll have to provide an attempt at a solution to get help.
 
jdou86 said:
not far at all i was trying to compute the area raito btwn when it is at the end of the tube and far away. but my answer comes nothing close to the choices below
How are you using the bit about 50% being detected when the detector is placed against the face?
 
jdou86 said:
not far at all i was trying to compute the area raito btwn when it is at the end of the tube and far away. but my answer comes nothing close to the choices below
Please show these calculations, otherwise we can't tell what went wrong.
 
mfb said:
Please show these calculations, otherwise we can't tell what went wrong.
 

Attachments

  • 1507A4FE-B4F0-46A9-B12F-04D019144DC7.jpeg
    1507A4FE-B4F0-46A9-B12F-04D019144DC7.jpeg
    49.8 KB · Views: 216
The solid angle is not proportional to the subtended angle. Rather, it relates to the area of the spherical cap of a sphere centred on the source, the cap spanning the aperture.
When the source is in the centre of the aperture, radius r, the end cap is a hemisphere of area ##2\pi r^2##. Dividing by the area of the whole sphere we get ##\frac{2\pi r^2}{4\pi r^2}=0.5##.
With the source at distance d from the centre of the aperture, the whole sphere has area##4\pi (r^2+d^2)##. The endcap's area has shrunk to not much more than ##\pi r^2##.
However, I am uncertain how the 8cm length fits in. If it is relevant then I don't understand how it can capture 50% initially.
 
I'm sorry, but if that's your attempt of a solution, you are not ready for graduate school.

Your picture isn't labeled and your variables aren't defined.
You have expressions involving numbers, but no sense of what they are, where they come from, or where you are going with this.

If this is how you solve problems, when you get to Jackson or grad QM, you won't make it out the other end.

What you need to do is
  1. Post a labeled drawing
  2. Write down the relevant equation
  3. Fill in the symbolic expressions in that equation and simplify
  4. Now, and only now, plug in the numbers
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM and mfb
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
I'm sorry, but if that's your attempt of a solution, you are not ready for graduate school.

Your picture isn't labeled and your variables aren't defined.
You have expressions involving numbers, but no sense of what they are, where they come from, or where you are going with this.

If this is how you solve problems, when you get to Jackson or grad QM, you won't make it out the other end.

What you need to do is
  1. Post a labeled drawing
  2. Write down the relevant equation
  3. Fill in the symbolic expressions in that equation and simplify
  4. Now, and only now, plug in the numbers
Often I just know the answer, labeling are left to the engineers
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
I'm sorry, but if that's your attempt of a solution, you are not ready for graduate school.

Your picture isn't labeled and your variables aren't defined.
You have expressions involving numbers, but no sense of what they are, where they come from, or where you are going with this.

If this is how you solve problems, when you get to Jackson or grad QM, you won't make it out the other end.

What you need to do is
  1. Post a labeled drawing
  2. Write down the relevant equation
  3. Fill in the symbolic expressions in that equation and simplify
  4. Now, and only now, plug in the numbers
And this is physics GREthere is no time for all these steps you wanted
 
  • #12
IMG_20190903_012843.jpg
I just solved the problem with two l
haruspex said:
The solid angle is not proportional to the subtended angle. Rather, it relates to the area of the spherical cap of a sphere centred on the source, the cap spanning the aperture.
When the source is in the centre of the aperture, radius r, the end cap is a hemisphere of area ##2\pi r^2##. Dividing by the area of the whole sphere we get ##\frac{2\pi r^2}{4\pi r^2}=0.5##.
With the source at distance d from the centre of the aperture, the whole sphere has area##4\pi (r^2+d^2)##. The endcap's area has shrunk to not much more than ##\pi r^2##.
However, I am uncertain how the 8cm length fits in. If it is relevant then I don't understand how it can capture 50% initially.
Thanks to you I solved it with 1 line of math
 
  • #13
Vanadium 50 said:
I'm sorry, but if that's your attempt of a solution, you are not ready for graduate school.

Your picture isn't labeled and your variables aren't defined.
You have expressions involving numbers, but no sense of what they are, where they come from, or where you are going with this.

If this is how you solve problems, when you get to Jackson or grad QM, you won't make it out the other end.

What you need to do is
  1. Post a labeled drawing
  2. Write down the relevant equation
  3. Fill in the symbolic expressions in that equation and simplify
  4. Now, and only now, plug in the numbers
And fyi your response is both rude and ignorant. I don't think landau did any of the labeling crap. But discovered phase transition.
 
  • #14
jdou86 said:
Often I just know the answer, labeling are left to the engineers

And when you don't know what the answer is? You're not going to be able to ask us when you're taking the GRE.

Anyway, It doesn't really matter if you don't want to take our advice. This will fix itself sooner or later.
 
  • #15
Vanadium 50 said:
And when you don't know what the answer is? You're not going to be able to ask us when you're taking the GRE.

Anyway, It doesn't really matter if you don't want to take our advice. This will fix itself sooner or later.
Labeling was never the problem I think you are too arrogant to see that. Sure. So as your ego
 
  • #16
jdou86 said:
fyi your response is both rude and ignorant

jdou86 said:
I think you are too arrogant to see that

This attitude just got you a warning and a closed thread. Please be civil to others when you come here asking for help with a problem.

Also, for future reference, you should not post equations or solutions as images. Please use the PF LaTeX feature to post those directly:

https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
Back
Top