Can special relativity result in alternative realities?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of special relativity (SR) in a thought experiment involving a traincar rigged with sensors that trigger an explosion based on the simultaneous detection of light. Observers inside and outside the train perceive the timing of light reaching the sensors differently, leading to a debate on whether this results in different outcomes. Ultimately, it is concluded that both observers must arrive at the same result regarding the explosion, affirming that SR does not lead to alternative realities. The key questions revolve around the timing of sensor activation and the criteria for simultaneous triggering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with inertial frames of reference
  • Knowledge of light propagation and simultaneity
  • Basic mechanics of sensor operation
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of simultaneity in special relativity
  • Study the implications of inertial frames on physical experiments
  • Investigate the thought experiments used in relativity, such as the train and light clock scenarios
  • Learn about the role of observers in relativistic physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining special relativity, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of relativistic scenarios.

junglebeast
Messages
514
Reaction score
2
Take the traincar thought experiment with light emitted towards front and back of the train. Assume that the train is rigged with mirrors at the wall that will direct the light around the edges of the train wall, ceiling, and then back to the center of the train at the rooftop, where a sensor is located. The sensor is rigged to blow up the train if it receives light from both sides within some small fraction of time.

To an observer from the perspective within the train, the light hits both sides of the sensor simultaneously and the train blows up (killing the observer). To an observer outside of the train, the light hits one sensor long before the other, so the train does not blow up, and the person inside the train survives.

Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both observers must give the same result for an experiment such as "does the traincar explode or not"? The idea is that the sensors are inside the train, so they obey the rules that apply inside the train; the train explodes. To analyze it from outside, you have to boost yourself into the inside frame first to see what the sensors are seeing.
 
Matterwave said:
Both observers must give the same result for an experiment such as "does the traincar explode or not"? The idea is that the sensors are inside the train, so they obey the rules that apply inside the train; the train explodes. To analyze it from outside, you have to boost yourself into the inside frame first to see what the sensors are seeing.

Suppose that the sensor device is see-through and the observer is watching with a telescope that allows him to see in great detail what is going on inside that sensor. The sensor is governed by simple mechanical principles. If he does not observe the light to enter both sides of the sensor at the same time, then he will not observe those visible principles to trigger the sensor. So, if what you are saying is true, he must observe some great "action at a distance" in order to explain the spontaneous explosion of the train.

Secondly, if what you are saying is true, then the frame of reference makes a difference for the experiment...and I thought that one of the principles of relativity is that it should not make a difference what frame of reference the calculations are done in...
 
junglebeast said:
Is this right?
No, SR will never result in alternative realities.

Your description of the scenario was a little confusing, but there are really only two questions that need to be answered to show whether or not the bomb explodes:
1) where and when does each sensor trigger in some inertial frame
2) how does the bomb determine if the sensors were triggered simultaneously

No matter how you answer those two questions, the result will be the same in all inertial frames.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
775