Can the Carnot Reversible Machine Challenge the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

AI Thread Summary
Cengel's thermodynamics illustrates that no machine can surpass the efficiency of a Carnot reversible machine through a thought experiment involving both reversible and irreversible machines connected to temperature reservoirs. The discussion highlights that if an irreversible machine were assumed to be more efficient than the Carnot machine, it would lead to a scenario violating the second law of thermodynamics when both machines are interconnected. The key point is that the work produced by the heat engine must be less than the heat consumed from the hot reservoir by the Carnot refrigerator, ensuring compliance with the second law. This reinforces the principle that a heat engine cannot transfer heat from a cold to a hot reservoir without external work input. Ultimately, the second law remains intact as long as the efficiencies of the machines adhere to thermodynamic principles.
Chacabucogod
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I was reading Cengel's thermodynamics and noticed that he uses a thought experiment to show that there is no machine that is more efficient than the Carnot reversible machine. He says that both a reversible machine and an irreversible machine are connected to high and low temperature deposits, and that they both receive Qh from the high temperature deposit. He next assumes that the irreversible machine is more efficient than the Carnot machine, and reverses the Carnot machine so that it works as a "refrigerator". The refrigerator is going to be providing Qh to the hot deposit and the irreversible machine will receive Qh so that the deposit can be taken away and both of the machines connected. Then the machines would not have two deposits to complete the cycle and it would not agree with the second law.

Now if I don't assume that the Carnot machine is less efficient than the irreversible machine and reverse it wouldn't the second law be broken too? Or would the Qh that the Carnot machine is providing be less than the required by they second machine?

Thank you
 
Science news on Phys.org
Chacabucogod said:
The refrigerator is going to be providing Qh to the hot deposit and the irreversible machine will receive Qh so that the deposit can be taken away and both of the machines connected. Then the machines would not have two deposits to complete the cycle and it would not agree with the second law.
Another way to see it is with both reservoirs connected, and the combination of the heat engine and the Carnot refrigerator as one machine. You would then get a heat engine that transfers heat from the cold reservoir to the hot one, without any external input. This is an obvious violation of the 2nd law.

Chacabucogod said:
Now if I don't assume that the Carnot machine is less efficient than the irreversible machine and reverse it wouldn't the second law be broken too? Or would the Qh that the Carnot machine is providing be less than the required by they second machine?
Remember that there is "work" between the two machines. If the heat engine's efficiency is equal or less than a Carnot engine, then the work produced by it, when supplied to the Carnot refrigerator, will lead to a transfer of heat from cold to hot reservoirs (by the Carnot refrigerator) that is less than the consumption of heat from the hot reservoir by the heat engine.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Back
Top