Can the Radius of a Disk Affect the Inclined Plane Experiment Results?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the impact of a disk's radius on an inclined plane experiment, specifically regarding questions 1.3 and 1.4 related to the relationship between sine and gradient. The participant has completed initial questions but struggles with applying conservation of energy principles, particularly in understanding energy loss and gain. They mention a specific radius of 750 mm for the disk and express confusion about the variable k2. Another contributor suggests incorporating the moment of inertia into the solution and notes that a larger radius may cause the disk to drag on the ground unless the ramp is elevated. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying theoretical concepts to practical experiments.
Andrew187
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi there I was wondering if someone can help me on this attachment I am stuck on question 1.3 and 1.4. This was an experiment to see relationship between sin and gradient I have confidently completed the first two questions but it is the last two questions which are troubling with I am finding it difficult to get a grasp of. Any help or input would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
What is your attempt at the question? It says you have to use conservation of energy. Think of how energy is lost, and how it is gained.
 
On my first reaction I think that g sin\Theta is the total for the sin\Theta from the total and r2 is the radius of the disc which in this case is 750mm but I don't understand what k2 is?
 
Just out of curiosity has anyone ever come across these questions before as I haven't covered even the basics of it in level 3 so I don't know how to tackle this problem this is a level 4 question.
 
First, you should use the moment of inertia in the solution.
If the radius of disk is 750 mm it will drag the ground unless the ramp is raised somehow.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top