Can You Combine Basis Vectors from Different Coordinate Systems?

Lancelot59
Messages
640
Reaction score
1
While not paying attention in class my friend made a joke that a cube squared was in six dimensions, or something like that. Terrible joke, but now I'm trying to figure out if it is valid to arithmatically combine the basis vectors for two or more coordinate systems to get a new one.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
the 2-dimensional space has its square...
the 3-dimensional space has its square (cube)...
most probably each n-dimensional space has its "square", too...

I seem to recall a reference to the 4-dimensional space "square" and while impossible to visualize it in its own space, I think somebody figured out what its shade looks like in the 3-dimensional space...I am sure there is a figure somewhere on the net.
 
gsal said:
the 2-dimensional space has its square...
the 3-dimensional space has its square (cube)...
most probably each n-dimensional space has its "square", too...

I seem to recall a reference to the 4-dimensional space "square" and while impossible to visualize it in its own space, I think somebody figured out what its shade looks like in the 3-dimensional space...I am sure there is a figure somewhere on the net.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesseract
 
That's not exactly what I had in mind...

For instance, is it valid to take the basis vectors for spherical coordinates, and conical coordinates, then add or multiply them together?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top