Capacitance, Charge Density, and Young's Modulus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor with a compressible dielectric, specifically a nerve axon's bilipid membrane. The initial equations for capacitance, charge density, and Young's modulus are outlined, with an emphasis on relating these concepts through strain and electric field equations. The key relationship established is between Young's modulus and linear charge density, leading to a final expression for capacitance as a function of voltage. The derived formula is C(V) = C(initial)[(1 + V^2*epsilon(zero)*(kappa))/(2Y*d)], which integrates the effects of voltage and material properties. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the interplay between mechanical and electrical properties in capacitive systems.
ZedLeppelin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've done a search for some help on my problem, but I haven't seen anything resemble it. Anyway my question is the following:

Not all dielectrics that separate the plates of a capacitor are rigid. For example, the membrane of a nerve axon is a bilipid layer that has a finite compressibility. Consider a parallel-plate capacitor whose plate separation is maintained by a dielectric of dielectric constant (kappa) = 3.0 and thickness d = 0.2 mm, when the potential across the capacitor is zero. The dielectric, which has a dielectric strength of 40 kV/mm is highly compressible, with a Young's modulus for compressive stress of 5*10^6 N/m^2. The capacitance of the capacitor in the limit V -> 0 is C(initial). Derive an expression for the capacitance, as a function of voltage across the capcitor.

Well, what I have so far is C = Q/V and C = epsilon(zero)*A/d

I'm pretty sure I should be doing an indefinte integral of the funtion at the end seeing as they give me a limit whereby the constant will just be C(initial) since they want capacitance as a function of voltage.

I have an idea of what I should be doing to bring the voltage to the top of the equation by multiplying C by V/Q so that I get:

C = (epsilon(zero)*A*V)/(d*Q)

and then to get rid of the Q, I'd have the linear charge density relationship:

sigma = Q / A

which when subbed into my equation above will give me:

C = (epsilon(zero)*V)/(sigma*d)

I'm stuck here, on how to relate Young's modulus to the charge density.

The answer given in the back of the book is C(V) = C(initial)[(1 + V^2*epsilon(zero)*(kappa))/(2Y*d)]

The question I'm having to resolve here now is how to relate Young's modulus, Y, to the linear charge density, kappa, and the initial capacitance. Thanks to anyone who can shed some light on this, and if I'm actually headed in the right direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi there,

It seems like you are on the right track with your equations. To relate Young's modulus to the linear charge density, we can use the concept of strain, which is a measure of the deformation of a material under stress. In this case, we can relate the strain to the electric field between the plates of the capacitor.

Let's start with the equation for strain:

strain = change in length/original length = deltaL/L

We can also relate the strain to the electric field, E, using the following equation:

strain = (epsilon(zero)*E)/Y

where epsilon(zero) is the permittivity of free space and Y is the Young's modulus.

Now, we can rearrange this equation to solve for E:

E = (Y*strain)/epsilon(zero)

We can also relate the electric field to the linear charge density, sigma, using Gauss's law:

E = sigma/(epsilon(zero)*kappa)

where kappa is the dielectric constant.

Now, we can combine these two equations to get:

sigma = (Y*strain)/(epsilon(zero)*kappa)

Substituting this into your equation for capacitance, we get:

C = (epsilon(zero)*A*V)/((Y*strain)/(epsilon(zero)*kappa)*d)

Simplifying, we get:

C = (epsilon(zero)*A*V*kappa)/(Y*strain*d)

Finally, we can substitute in the initial capacitance, C(initial), and rearrange to get the final expression:

C(V) = C(initial)[(1 + V^2*epsilon(zero)*(kappa))/(2Y*d)]

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top