Capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor with 2 dielectrics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor with two dielectrics. The initial approach involves using integration to derive expressions for two small capacitors and summing them in parallel. However, the derived equations, particularly the final integral involving a logarithmic function, are deemed incorrect. Participants emphasize the need to avoid substituting equal dielectric constants directly, as it leads to an indeterminate form. The conversation highlights the importance of proper limits and corrections in the mathematical formulation.
bigevil
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the capacitance of the parallel plate capacitor with 2 dielectrics below. Given that the parallel plate capacitor has area A = WL and the separation between plates is d.

vfedyr.png



The Attempt at a Solution



My method is to use integration. First solve for two small capacitors dC1, dC2 and then sum them up in parallel.

y = \frac{d}{L}x

dC_1 = \frac{\kappa_1 \epsilon_0 WL dx}{d(L-x)}

dC_2 = \frac{\kappa_2 \epsilon_0 WL}{d} \frac{1}{x} dx

dC = \frac{dC_1 dC_2}{dC_1 + dC_2} = \frac{\kappa_1 \kappa_2 \epsilon_0 WL}{d} \cdot \frac{1}{\kappa_2 L + x(\kappa_1 - \kappa_2)}

C = \frac{\kappa_1\kappa_2 \epsilon_0 WL}{d(\kappa_1 - \kappa_2)} \left[ ln (\kappa_2 L + x(\kappa_1 - \kappa_2) \right]_0^L

The expression is definitely wrong. If we let the two dielectrics have equal value k, we should expect C to follow that of a single dielectric, C' = kC.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have one more L in the expressions of dC. The area of an elementary capacitor is Wdx.

ehild
 
Ok, but L is a constant and having amended that, it doesn't make the final integral any more correct. The ln form of the last equation is still clearly wrong.
 
Are you sure that the ln is wrong? You can not simply substitute K1=K2, it will lead to 0/0. You have to take the limit K2/K1-->1.
ehild
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top