Capacitor and dielectrics help

vortexbaby
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is a conceptial problem. A slab of dielectric, with a dielectric constant K between an isolated parallel-plate capacitor, is removed. The two plates of the capacitor have charges Q and -Q, which do not change when the slab is removed. Is the energy stored in the capacitor more, less, or the same after the dielectric is removed? If it is more, what is the source of the extra energy? If less, where does the lost energy go?

Now I know that the Potential Difference (V) increases when the slab is removed, plus the capacitance (C) decreases. This means that the energy stored in the capacitor should increase, but where does this extra energy come from? I've worked on this problem for so long that I've confused myself.

Vortexbaby
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's assume the capacitor is disconnected from any external circuit.

Removing the dielectric would indeed increase the energy stored in the capacitor.
This means that you need to bring energy in order to remove the dielectric: the dielectric is attracted by the capacitor. This is clear from the forces involved: the (opposite) surface charges on the dielectric are attracted by the plates. You need to work against these forces to remove the dielectric. The funny thing is that this work is stored in the capacitor!

On the other side, the attraction force between the two plates will increase since the "shielding" by the dielectric has be removed.

The details of this process might be a little bit more complicated, like the exact shape of the electric field lines when the dielectric is removed. This shows the "magic" of the energy theorem that allows us to quantitfy this attraction force between the plates and the slab is a very easy way.

Have a look at this site for applications:


Would that also play a role sometimes in adhesion? Any idea?

Michel
 
Last edited:
vortexbaby said:
This is a conceptial problem. A slab of dielectric, with a dielectric constant K between an isolated parallel-plate capacitor, is removed. The two plates of the capacitor have charges Q and -Q, which do not change when the slab is removed. Is the energy stored in the capacitor more, less, or the same after the dielectric is removed? If it is more, what is the source of the extra energy? If less, where does the lost energy go?

Now I know that the Potential Difference (V) increases when the slab is removed, plus the capacitance (C) decreases. This means that the energy stored in the capacitor should increase, but where does this extra energy come from? I've worked on this problem for so long that I've confused myself.
Since the potential difference (energy per unit charge) increases, the total energy increases. It can only come from the energy used in removing the dielectric. What forces are acting on the dielectric?

AM
 
Thread has been merged.

Zz.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top