Capacitor and Variable resistor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the appropriate resistance range for a variable resistor in an electronic arcade game's capacitor discharge circuit. The initial calculations yielded a maximum resistance of 27272.7Ω and a minimum of 45.45Ω, which were questioned for being excessively high. A participant suggested using the formula V=V0e^(-t/RC) to recalculate, resulting in values of 24.8Ω and 14882Ω, approximately half of the original figures. The conversation highlights the exponential nature of voltage decay in RC circuits, emphasizing that higher resistance leads to slower discharge rates. The participants are seeking clarification on their calculations and the relationships between voltage, current, and resistance in this context.
coldturkey
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
A controller on an electronic arcade game consists of a variable resistor connected across the plates of a 0.220\mu F capacitor. The capacitor is charged to 5.00V, then discharged through the resistor. The time for the potential difference across the plates to decrease to 0.800V is measured by a clock inside the game. If the range of discharge times that can be handled effectivly is from 10.0\mu s to 6.00ms, what should be the resistance range of the resistor?

I have solved the problem and I get a maximum resistance of 27272.7\Omega and a minimum resistance of 45.45\Omega.
But these values seem a bit too large.

The way I did it:
I = q/t
q = CV
so I = CV/t
and R = V/I

and solved it for all 4 cases:
(max voltage, largest discharge time)
(max voltage, smallest discharge time)
(min voltage, largest discharge time)
(min voltage, smallest discharge time)

An found there are two different values for the resistor:
27272.7\Omega and 45.45\Omega.

Does anyone know if there is anything I have done wrong?
Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can use the formula:
V=V_{0}e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}
 
I tried it using your formula and I get 24.8 ohms and 14882 ohms.
This is roughly half of what I got before.
Any ideas?
 
the way it is worded, cartoon kid is correct.

jw, but what was your reasoning behind this?

coldturkey said:
and solved it for all 4 cases:
(max voltage, largest discharge time)
(max voltage, smallest discharge time)
(min voltage, largest discharge time)
(min voltage, smallest discharge time)
 
Last edited:
coldturkey said:
I tried it using your formula and I get 24.8 ohms and 14882 ohms.
This is roughly half of what I got before.
Any ideas?

In a RC circuit, when a capacitor is discharging, the charges, current and voltage across the capacitor are decreasing exponentially. It's a continuous process. The bigger the R, the slower the discharing process.
 
well I wasnt sure what the relationships were all about so I just decided to try all possible cases and see what I came up with.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top