Car-Truck Collision: Initial Common Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial common velocity of a car and truck involved in an inelastic collision. A car weighing 1400 kg traveling west at 50 km/h collides with a 2000 kg truck heading north at 40 km/h. Participants suggest using momentum conservation principles, emphasizing the importance of vector directions in the calculations. Two methods were attempted: one using algebraic momentum conservation and the other employing vector diagrams. Ultimately, both methods are valid, but clarity on vector addition is crucial for accurate results.
Mr.somebody
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A car with a mass of 1400 kg is westbound at 50 km/h. It collides at an intersection with a northbound truck having a mass of 2000 kg and traveling at 40 km/h. What is the initial common velocity of the car and truck immediately after the collision if they have an inelastic collision? For this question, a diagram is drawn for you. The mass' stick after colliding[/B]

Homework Equations


p=mv

The Attempt at a Solution


So i tried 2 different methods
m1v1+m2v2=mv* and the other method i used was that i drew a triangle (made vectors) found the hypotenuse (momentum combined) and from there i divided by the mass to get the velocity.
When i did this i got 2 different answers I am really confused which one is correct please help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is a vector and so you need to pay attention to the directions .

The best and easiest way to solve this question would be to conserve momentum along north-south direction , and then along east west , and then simply find the net magnitude of velocity .

I cannot understand what exactly you have written , but from what I can tell , method 2 seems to be correct .
 
Both methods are correct. The second method is just a graphical representation of the first.
But as Qwertywerty said: you can't just add vectors.
 
Oh, okay thank you soo much guys I get it now :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top