Center of mass for rigid body and point particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the center of mass for a system consisting of a uniform beam and a point particle attached to it. The beam has a length L and mass M, with its center of mass initially at -L/2. When a point particle of mass m attaches itself to the beam at (0, -L, 0), the new center of mass must be recalculated. The proposed formula for the center of mass is R = (-M(L/2) - mL) / (M + m) in the vertical direction, which confirms that as m becomes negligible compared to M, the center of mass approaches -L/2. The discussion highlights the importance of considering the mass of both components in the calculation.
Noorac
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is a problem on center mass.

Homework Statement


A beam hangs straight down from a point O(O is placed at x=0 and y = 0, aka origo). The beam is attached to the point O. Beam has length L and mass M. The density of the beam is uniform, so the centermass of the beam is -\frac{L}{2}\boldsymbol{\hat{\jmath}}. A point particle with mass m is shot into the beam at (0,-L,0) and latches itself onto the beam in (0,-L,0) so it becomes a part of the beam at that point.

What is the center of mass for the system consisting of the beam and the particle?
(I first thought the center of mass was still at -\frac{L}{2}, but the task does not state anywhere that m<< M).

Homework Equations



--

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking of using center of mass for a particle system, but since one of the "particles" is a beam, I assume I cannot use \vec{R} = \frac{1}{M}\Sigma m_i \vec{r}_i. And since I don't know the densitydifference for the point particle nor the beam, I don't think I can use \vec{R} = \frac{1}{M} \int \int \int \vec{r} \rho dV

Not sure how to approach finding the total center of mass, though maybe the answer is right there and I don't see it. Any ideas?

Edit; Is the subdivision principle applicable here?

So:

\vec{R} = \frac{-M\frac{L}{2} -mL}{M+m}\boldsymbol{\hat{\jmath}}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks good to me at least, and you do see that in the limit m<<M the stick goes back to L/2 CM.
 
Mindscrape said:
That looks good to me at least, and you do see that in the limit m<<M the stick goes back to L/2 CM.

Yeah, that's a good point! Thanks=)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top