Change for position to energy basis

lrf
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Give expressions for computing the matrix elements Xmn of the matrix X representing the position operator X in the energy basis (using eigenvectors of the Harmiltonian operator)

Also told to consider the example of the harmonic oscillator where energy eigenvalues are En=(1/2+n)hω

Homework Equations



Xmn=<em|X|en>

H|en>=En|en>

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm thrown off a bit by how Xmn is defined here - if it is originally in the |x> basis, why is Xmn defined using |em> and |en>. Shouldn't these be inserted using the completeness relation to convert the matrix into the energy basis representation?

Here goes...
Xmn=<em|X|en>
Xmn=ƩƩ<em|x><x|X|x'><x'|en>
Xmn=ƩƩem(x)X(x,x')en(x')
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the algebraic formulation of the harmonic oscilator and write X in terms of a and a^dagger. The action of a and a^dagger on the standard basis (eigenvectors of N and H) is already known, so...
 
dextercioby said:
You can use the algebraic formulation of the harmonic oscilator and write X in terms of a and a^dagger.

Sorry, still very confused!

So use -h2/2m d2ψ/dx2+1/2mω2x2ψ=Eψ how?
 
or use 1/2P2+1/2m2X2=H ?
 
No, X and P need to be replaced by the raising and the lowering ladder operators, a and a^{\dagger}. You should be familiar with them, I hope...
 
yes, got it now, thank you for the push in the right direction!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top