Change in pressure and Internal Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between changes in pressure, volume, and internal energy in thermodynamic processes. It confirms that for an isovolumetric process, the change in internal energy can be expressed as ΔU = 3/2 ΔP V. A specific example is provided where a pressure change from 200 Pa to 100 Pa at a constant volume of 6 m³ yields a change in internal energy of 900 J. The conversation also raises a question about scenarios where initial and final PV values are known, but ΔU cannot be directly calculated using ΔU = 3/2 ΔPV, suggesting that more complex methods may be necessary. Limitations of the equation for monatomic ideal gases are acknowledged, indicating the need for careful application in various contexts.
wongrufus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm aware of the equation
ΔU = Q + W
ΔU is the change in internal energy which equals 3/2 nRΔT
Q is heat transfer
W is workdone

so PV = nRT
would it be correct to say that
ΔP V = nRΔT?

For isovolumetric process (i.e. no volume change, no work done),
can i say that
change in internal energy = 3/2 nRΔT = 3/2 ΔP V?

Say
Pressure changes from 200Pa --> 100Pa
Volume remains at 6 m^3
Would it be right to conclude that the change in internal energy = 3/2 x 100 x 6 = 900J?

**New Question: Is it possible (and if possible, under what condition) that the initial PV and final PV are known BUT the change in internal energy cannot be found directly by ΔU = 3/2 ΔPV?
coz i always come across questions where a P-V graph is given but the internal energy has to be calculated by more complicated methods,
i.e. ΔU = Q + W and not ΔU = 3/2 ΔPV

thx*c
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that is correct for a monatomic ideal gas. 900 J of heat flows into the system, which raises the temperature, which increases the pressure, which accounts for the increase in internal energy by the relation ΔU=3/2 ΔP V as you say.
 
does the equation
ΔU = 3/2 nRΔT = 3/2 PΔV = 3/2 ΔPV
have its limitations?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top