Change in rotational kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the fractional decrease in rotational kinetic energy when a second disk is placed on a rotating disk. Participants express confusion about the problem's requirements and the conservation principles involved, particularly regarding angular momentum and kinetic energy. The correct approach involves using the moment of inertia for each disk and determining the new angular velocity after the collision. Errors in algebraic substitutions and understanding the relationship between initial and final kinetic energy are highlighted. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in equations and proper handling of the variables involved in the calculation.
Minestra
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A disk of mass m1 is rotating freely with constant angular speed ω. Another disk of mass m2 that has the same radius is gently placed on the first disk. If the surfaces in contact are rough so that there is no slipping between the disks, what is the fractional decrease in the kinetic energy of the system? (Use any variable or symbol stated above as necessary. Enter the magnitude.)

It wants ΔK/Ki

The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't think I understand what is being asked of me here. I have attempted to find ΔK by using the moment of inertia of a disk, and then adding a second disk of mass m2. But that got me nowhere. I wish I could offer up a better attempt but I'm at a loss.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think collision. What type of collision is it? What's conserved?
 
Well I do believe it's conservation of momentum, but I'm having trouble figuring out what they're asking me to solve for once I write out the equation.
 
You wrote:
Minestra said:
It wants ΔK/Ki
So it looks like they want you to find the fraction of the rotational KE that was lost in the collision.
 
So I would solve for the new velocity and use that to find the kinetic energy after the collision?
 
Then I would basically set the difference over the original and that would be the answer?
 
Minestra said:
Then I would basically set the difference over the original and that would be the answer?
That would be my thinking, yes.
 
Thanks for talking it out with me, got to work an overnight now, I'll do the algebra tomorrow.
 
So I think I solved the problem do you mind looking over my work?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20161026_234556255.jpg
    IMG_20161026_234556255.jpg
    18.6 KB · Views: 538
  • #10
Minestra said:
So I think I solved the problem do you mind looking over my work?
Posting algebra as images, even if readable, makes it hard to make comments referencing specific lines. At the least, please number the equations, but better still, please take the trouble to type the algebra into the post.
Your third equation looks like conservation of energy, which is clearly not valid.
There are two errors in the next equation.
 
  • #11
You should express ##I_1## and ##I_2## in terms of m and r. The r's are the same for both disks so you can be pretty sure that the r's will disappear somewhere along the way. But the important thing is to incorporate the given information that the disks differ in their mass.
 
  • #12
Sorry for the photo reply I'm on my moble. I'll do my best to type it out once I'm back on my desktop.

If I rework using I = mr2 and ω = v/r, would the rest of my thought process be correct in using the angular velocity at moment two, to find a new kinetic energy, which could then be subtracted from the original to determine its change?
 
  • #13
Minestra said:
I = mr2
Not the right formula for a disk.
As I mentioned, there are errors in some of your previous equations.
 
  • #14
Leave the ω's alone. There's no need to introduce linear velocity. The idea is to incorporate the different masses, hence the differing moments of inertia for the disks. Just use the (correct) form for the MOI of a disk and analyze the collision.
 
  • #15
Sorry for the long delay I have been busy with work.

Here is my attempt at this problem:

Angular Momentum:

$$\frac{1}{2}m_{1}r^{2}\omega_{1} = \frac{1}{2}(m_{1}+m_{2})r^{2}\omega _{2}$$

solving for ω2 and canceling out what you can, you get:

$$\omega_{2} = \frac{m_{1}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}\omega _{1}$$

Next we take this new ω which should be our speed after collision and substitute it into the kinetic energy equation:

$$\frac{1}{4}m_{1}r^{2}\omega _{1}^{2} = \frac{1}{4}(m_{1}+m_{2})r^{2}\frac{m_{1}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}$$

Setting this equal to zero would have you subtract kinetic energy, thus giving you the difference as follows:

$$\frac{1}{4}m_{1}r^{2}\omega _{1}^{2} - \frac{1}{4}(m_{1}+m_{2})r^{2}\frac{m_{1}}{m_{1}+m_{2}} = \Delta K$$

Putting this over Ki as the question requests would get you:

$$-\frac{1}{4}r^{2}m_{1}$$

Which of course results in an incorrect answer from web-assign. I understand I made some errors somewhere, I would greatly appreciate being told exactly what I did wrong. I know it's not the best for my education but I need to submit the assignment by tomorrow night and my professor is grossly unavailable when it comes to help (numerous emails throughout the semester with not a single response, I have confirmed with other students that he does this) and I fear I will not be able to solve it.
 
  • #16
Minestra said:
Next we take this new ω which should be our speed after collision and substitute it into the kinetic energy equation:
$$\frac{1}{4}m_{1}r^{2}\omega _{1}^{2} = \frac{1}{4}(m_{1}+m_{2})r^{2}\frac{m_{1}}{m_{1}+m_{2}}$$
Not sure what you are doing there. I think what you mean is that the expression on the left is initial KE and the expression on the right is the final KE. They are clearly not equal.
If so, you have made a mistake or two in substituting for ω2 on the right. Try that step again.
 
Back
Top