Changing evaluation of an axis on a triple integral

AI Thread Summary
Changing the direction of evaluation in triple integrals can be complex, especially with complicated bounds. Optimization in several variables is not necessary for this process. Visual aids, such as graphs, are highly recommended to clarify the limits of integration. When evaluating, the inner integral's limits should correspond to the orientation of the axes, and equations for these limits must be established. Ultimately, using graphical representations simplifies the understanding of the integration process.
vjk2
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
So I'm in the middle of a calculus 3 course, and one thing I've been lightly chewing on is how to change the direction of evaluation of a double/triple integral when the bounds are complicated enough that they can't be drawn easily on a graph. Would you have to use the optimization in several variables equation, fxx(a,b)fyy(a,b)-fxy(a,b)^2?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No. I don't see that optimization has anything to do with your question. Pictures are always a very good idea. Sometimes you can do it by just studying the equations. For example if you want your inner integral to be in the x direction your limits would go from x-on-the-back to x-on-the-front (assuming the usual orientation of xyz axes. If you set the equation for x-on-the-back equal to x-on-the-front you will have a yz equation to analyze for your next limits. And of course you need to be able to write the yz equations for x-on-the-back and x-on-the-front. Similarly for the other directions first. But you can't beat picking it off the graph.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top