Changing order of integration (double) in polar coord

  • Thread starter Thread starter nothingness00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Polar
nothingness00
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Change the order of the limits of integration of the following double integral and evaluate.

Homework Equations



\int_{0}^\frac{\pi}{2} \int_{0}^{cos(\theta)} cos(\theta)\,dr\,d\theta

The Attempt at a Solution



Evaluating as it is, I arrive an answer of \frac{\pi}{4}.

I know the region to be integrated is the semicircle bounded by the polar axis, with corner points at r = 0, and r = 1, with a height of 1/2. I know that normally, in the cartesian case, to change the order of integration requires the limits to be written from y(x) to x(y), with the x or y intervals adjust accordingly.

Thus, for this problem, the original region is bounded by:

0<r<cos(\theta) and 0<\theta<\frac{\pi}{2}.

Changing the form, I would write,

0<\theta<cos^{-1}(r) and 0<r<1

Trying to evaluate in this manner, I end up at

\int_{0}^1 sin(cos^{-1}(r))\,dr,

after which I cannot go further. I have very little experience of changing limit orders in the polar case. Any hints would be appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: note that sin x = sqrt ( 1 - cos^2 x ).
 
Cool, thanks; Using the hint: I get

## \int_{0}^1 \sqrt{1-cos(r)}\,dr ##

Multiplying by a factor of sin(r)/sin(r), I get,

## \int_{0}^1 \frac{sin(r)}{\sqrt{1+cos(r)}}\,dr ##.

I use a substitution of

## u = 1 + cos(r) ## with
## \,du = -sin(r)\,dr ##.

I substitute the limits by using

## u_0 = 1+cos(0) = 2 ##
## u_1 = 1+cos(1) = ~1.5403... ##

Evaluating the new integral, through

## -[2u^{\frac{1}{2}}] ##

between u1=1.5403... and u0 = 2, I get an answer of ~0.173144 which is not quite ##\frac{\pi}{4} ##

Are my limits wrong, or did I blunder somewhere else?
 
Unfortunately the first line is still incorrect.

CompuChip said:
Hint: note that sin x = sqrt ( 1 - cos^2 x ).

What would x be, looking at your integrand (it's not just r, as you seem to have assumed!).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top