Changing the order of a triple integral

JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156

Homework Statement



$$\int_{-23/4}^4\int_0^{4-y}\int_0^{\sqrt{4y+23}} f(x,y,z) dxdzdy$$

Change the order of the integral to

$$\iiint f(x,y,z) \, \mathrm{dydzdx}$$What I have done

It is just about:

From ##x=0## to ##x=\sqrt{4y+23}##

From ##z=0## to ##z=4-y##

From ##y=\frac{x^2-23}{4}## to ##y=4##

So

$$\int_0^{\sqrt{23}}\int_0^4\int_{\frac{x^2-23}{4}}^{4} f(x,y,z) dydzdx$$

But this is incorrect. What am I missing?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
JD_PM said:

Homework Statement



$$\int_{-23/4}^4\int_0^{4-y}\int_0^{\sqrt{4y+23}} f(x,y,z) dxdzdy$$

Change the order of the integral to

$$\iiint f(x,y,z) \, \mathrm{dydzdx}$$What I have done

It is just about:

From ##x=0## to ##x=\sqrt{4y+23}##

From ##z=0## to ##z=4-y##

From ##y=\frac{x^2-23}{4}## to ##y=4##

So

$$\int_0^{\sqrt{23}}\int_0^4\int_{\frac{x^2-23}{4}}^{4} f(x,y,z) dydzdx$$

But this is incorrect. What am I missing?

Thanks
Are you missing a sketch of the region of integration?
This region is fairly complicated, being the intersection of half of a parabolic solid whose axis is perpendicular to the x-y plane and a plane that makes an angle with the x-y plane.
 
JD_PM said:
What am I missing?
The integral over ##dx## yields a function of ##y##
Try it with ##f(x,y,z) = 1##
 
BvU said:
The integral over ##dx## yields a function of ##y##
Try it with ##f(x,y,z) = 1##

I would say ##f(x,y,z) = 1## is not relevant for the problem; I am just interested in changing the extremes and not in solving the integral.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
JD_PM said:
So

$$\int_0^{\sqrt{23}}\int_0^4\int_{\frac{x^2-23}{4}}^{4} f(x,y,z) dydzdx$$

But this is incorrect. What am I missing?
I ask again, did you draw a sketch of the region of integration?

The limits of integration for z (the middle integration) are wrong. The top of the solid is not horizontal, so z is not uniformly equal to 4.
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
JD_PM said:
I would say ##f(x,y,z) = 1## is not relevant for the problem; I am just interested in changing the extremes and not in solving the integral.
Think about it.

Using ##\ f(x,y,z) = 1\,,\ ## as suggested by @BvU, would give a check as to whether the limits of integration you obtained give the same result as the original limits.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and JD_PM
Mark44 said:
I ask again, did you draw a sketch of the region of integration?

The limits of integration for z (the middle integration) are wrong. The top of the solid is not horizontal, so z is not uniformly equal to 4.
Captura de pantalla (504).png

The sketch is something like this (slice perpendicular to x axis, as asked). This is what I visualise now

x axis extremes: From ##x=0## to ##x=\sqrt{23}##

z axis extremes: From ##z=0## to ##z=4-y##

y axis extremes: From ##y=\frac{x^2-23}{4}## to ##z=4-z##

But there is obviously something wrong with either the y or z extremes...
 

Attachments

  • Captura de pantalla (504).png
    Captura de pantalla (504).png
    8.7 KB · Views: 708
The new order of integration is y, z, and finally, x, so it's best to list the limits on those three variables in that order. I have quoted what you wrote, but have rearranged the order in what I've quoted.
JD_PM said:
View attachment 239631
The sketch is something like this (slice perpendicular to x axis, as asked). This is what I visualise now
Nice drawing!
JD_PM said:
y axis extremes: From ##y=\frac{x^2-23}{4}## to ##z=4-z##
No. Look at your drawing. The y values at the ends of the triangle base run from a point on the parabola to the line y = 4 in the x-y plane. The volume element is a cube of size dy*dz*dx. If you visualize a stack of these cubes, the stack will taper down to 0 as the y values increase to 4.
JD_PM said:
z axis extremes: From ##z=0## to ##z=4-y##
Yes.
JD_PM said:
x axis extremes: From ##x=0## to ##x=\sqrt{23}##
No, the x values run from 0 to the value at the point ##(\sqrt{39}, 4)##. Do you see why?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes BvU
Oh yeah so y-axis would be:

From ##y=\frac{x^2-23}{4}## to ##y=4##

I do not see why you state those extremes for the x axis. I see how it goes from 0 to the parabola. Besides, you stated 3 values. Please explain your reasoning
 
  • #10
JD_PM said:
Oh yeah so y-axis would be:

From ##y=\frac{x^2-23}{4}## to ##y=4##
Yes.
JD_PM said:
I do not see why you state those extremes for the x axis. I see how it goes from 0 to the parabola. Besides, you stated 3 values. Please explain your reasoning
Look at the triangle you drew in your sketch. As the triangle sweeps across from the y-axis, the y values range as you said above, and the x values go from 0 to the point on the parabola at which y = 4. IOW. to the point ##(\sqrt{39}, 4)##.
 
  • #11
JD_PM said:
View attachment 239631
The sketch is something like this (slice perpendicular to x axis, as asked). This is what I visualise now

x axis extremes: From ##x=0## to ##x=\sqrt{23}##

z axis extremes: From ##z=0## to ##z=4-y##

y axis extremes: From ##y=\frac{x^2-23}{4}## to ##z=4-z##

But there is obviously something wrong with either the y or z extremes...

Your heavy black triangle is not perpendicular to the x-axis; it slants a bit towards the yz-plane.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
  • #12
Mark44 said:
Yes.
Look at the triangle you drew in your sketch. As the triangle sweeps across from the y-axis, the y values range as you said above, and the x values go from 0 to the point on the parabola at which y = 4. IOW. to the point ##(\sqrt{39}, 4)##.

OK I've checked the answer:

$$\int_0^{\sqrt{39}}\int_0^{\frac{39-x^2}{4}}\int_{\frac{x^2-23}{4}}^{4-z} f(x,y,z) dydzdx$$

I understand the y-axis extremes.

Regarding z axis extremes; I get that its lower bound is ##z=0##. Its upper bound is the plane ##z=4-y## ; why is ##\frac{39-x^2}{4}## the correct upper bound then?

Regarding x-axis extremes. I have the same trouble dealing with the upper bound of x; why is ##\sqrt{39}## ?
 
  • #13
JD_PM said:
Regarding z axis extremes; I get that its lower bound is ##z=0##. Its upper bound is the plane ##z=4-y## ; why is ##\frac{39-x^2}{4}## the correct upper bound then?
The equation of the plane is z = 4 - y. The 3-D surface that the parabolic cylinder represents intersects the plane in a curve. Every point on this curve in the z = 4 - y plane lies above the parabola in the x-y plane, so these points satisfy both z = 4 - y and y = (x2 - 23)/4. For the upper bound for the y integration, they have replaced y in the equation z = 4 - y, getting z = (39 - x2)/4.

JD_PM said:
Regarding x-axis extremes. I have the same trouble dealing with the upper bound of x; why is ##\sqrt{39}## ?
Again, look at the triangle you drew. These triangles start on the y-axis (with x = 0), and sweep out on the pos. x-axis to the point where the parabola crosses the line y = 4 in the x-y plane. What is the y-coordinate at that point?
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
  • #14
You get ##\sqrt{39}##, indeed. Thank you.
 
Back
Top