Charge Density of wire with potential difference

Nexest
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Consider a long charged straight wire that lies fixed and a particle of charge +2e and mass 6.70E-27 kg. When the particle is at a distance 1.91 cm from the wire it has a speed 2.80E+5 m/s, going away from the wire. When it is at a new distance of 4.01 cm, its speed is 3.20E+6 m/s. What is the charge density of the wire?

Alright so this is how I approached it but didn't get it right:

The difference in kinetic energy at two given distances should be equal to the opposite difference in potential energy (\DeltaK = -\DeltaU), which when divided by the given charge of the particle should give the potential difference. Right? (\DeltaU = q*\DeltaV)

The potential difference is equal to -E*d where d is the distance between the two given points and E is the electric field of the wire given by: lambda/2*pi*epsilon*r.

With these you should be able to solve for lambda but I keep getting the answer wrong and I think its because I'm using the wrong r in the equation for the electric field. I thought r should be the distance from the wire to the farthest given point but I wasn't sure...

Can anyone help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without showing your work, I would guess you may be finding the potential incorrectly. It looks like you are treating E as a constant with the expression V=-E*d. Recall,

V=-\int \mbox{Edr}

where r is the perpendicular distance from the wire. Your approach to the problem appears correct.
 
Yes I think I found my problem, I can't use the simplified V = -Ed equation because E is not a uniform electric field in this case.
 
Can you please explain it in more detail ? How do you calculate the potential difference then if you can't consider it a uniforn electric field ? and what is d ?
 
*unicorn* said:
Can you please explain it in more detail ? How do you calculate the potential difference then if you can't consider it a uniforn electric field ? and what is d ?
I'm guessing you don't know calculus. chrisk explained it. You must integrate the electric field as a function of distance. The "d" means "differential". If you don't know calculus, then I don't expect you will have any idea what this means.
 
ok.. nevermind.. i got it.. thanks !
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top