Charged massive particle reacting to EM wave

RawrSpoon
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a particle of charge q and mass m, free to move in the xy plane in response to an electromagnetic wave propagating in the z direction (might as well set δ to zero)

a) Ignoring the magnetic force, find the velocity of the particle, as a function of time. (Assume the average velocity is zero).

b) Now calculate the resulting magnetic force on the particle

c) Show that the (time) average magnetic force is zero.

The problem with this naive model for the pressure of light is that the velocity is 90 degrees out of phase with the fields. For energy to be absorbed, there's got to be some resistance to the motion of the charges. Suppose we include a force of the form -γmv, for some damping constant γ.

d) Repeat part (a) (ignore the exponentially damped transient). Repeat part (b), and find the average magnetic force on the particle.

Homework Equations


E(zt) = E_0 cos(k z-\omega t + \delta)\hat{x}
B(zt) =\frac{1}{c} E_0 cos(k z-\omega t + \delta)\hat{z}

The Attempt at a Solution


So I got a,b, and c I'm pretty sure. A quick look over my work by you guys wouldn't be hurtful, I don't think. Thing is, I can't find the solutions manual for the fourth edition of Griffiths's "Introduction to Electrodynamics" anywhere, and this seems to be a new problem.

a) I figured that since we're finding the velocity of this while ignoring the magnetic field, we can find the velocity simply through
\int \! F \, \mathrm{d}t=p=mv
That
v=\frac{\int \! F \, \mathrm{d}t}{m}
As such, I got
v(t)=-\frac{qE_0}{\omega m}sin(kz-\omega t)\hat{x}

b) With this velocity, I remembered that
F=qv \times B
So with this knowledge, I found that
F=\frac{q^2E_0^2}{c \omega m}sin(kz-\omega t)cos(kz-\omega t)\hat{y}

c) The average of a function is
\frac{1}{T}\int_0^T \! f(t) \, \mathrm{d}t

So I found the average of the force over a complete cycle. Because we're in a complete cycle, I realized I had to use
\omega=\frac{2\pi}{T}
Upon doing the substitution and the integral, I proved the answer was 0. Simple enough.

Now, the part that's really killing me is d. I figure I solve it the same way except the force is replaced with
F=qE-\gamma mv However, this isn't proving to be fruitful, as I'm not really sure how to deal with the retarding force. At first I tried the same approach as in part a, with v being replaced as dx/dt which gave me
\int \gamma m \mathrm{d}x but that didn't make sense to me, since it'd mean that the retarding force would be based on the position? That doesn't really sit right with me.

I'm open to any suggestions as to where to head to next, and whether or not I'm doing this correctly at all! Thank you so much in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
RawrSpoon said:
since it'd mean that the retarding force would be based on the position?
It will, indirectly, as velocity depends on position (which you don't know yet).

##F=qE-\gamma mv## leads to a differential equation. Did you try solving this?
 
Funnily enough I JUST tried it about 30ish minutes ago. I think I did it wrong though, it's kind of a large equation and, to be fair, I let Mathematica solve it for me. Anyway, I tried the following
m\frac{dv}{dt}+\gamma mv=qE_0cos(kz-\omega t)
which led me to
v(t)=\frac{qE_0}{m(\gamma ^2+\omega ^2)}(\gamma cos(kz-\omega t)-\omega sin(kz-\omega t))\hat{x}+C_1 e^{-\gamma t} \hat{x}
Which looks incredibly complicated. I put in v(0)=0 and got
v(t)=\frac{qE_0}{m(\gamma ^2+\omega ^2)}\bigg( \Big( \gamma cos(kz-\omega t)-\omega sin(kz-\omega t) \Big)-e^{-\gamma t}\big(\gamma cos(kz) - \omega sin(kz)\big)\bigg) \hat{x}

Seems really complicated. Am I on the right track or should the answer be simpler?
 
Last edited:
The answer looks great, but don't use v(0)=0.
You can neglect the exponential term (see problem statement), then you get an oscillation that is shifted in phase with respect to the original oscillation. That's exactly what you need to get radiation pressure.
 
If I'm understanding you correctly, that means that C1 is 0, right? At least for these purposes.

As such I get that
F_{mag}=\frac{q^2E_0^2}{mc(\gamma^2+\omega^2)}\Big(\gamma cos^2(kz-\omega t)-\omega sin(kz-\omega t)cos(kz-\omega t)\Big)\hat{z}

Which would give me an average of
\frac{q^2E_0^2\gamma}{2mc(\gamma^2+\omega^2)}\hat{z}

I think I did it right, the solutions don't have striking errors I don't think?

I can't seem to edit the original post, but the y hat in part b should be a z hat, just a minor correction.
 
Last edited:
Looks right, the units match and it makes sense in terms of physics. I didn't check the prefactor.

RawrSpoon said:
I can't seem to edit the original post, but the y hat in part b should be a z hat, just a minor correction.
I fixed it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top