Charged particles - magnitude of force

hoseA
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
http://img77.imageshack.us/img77/5310/chargedparticles7of.png


What is the magnitude of the force on a
-1.2 muC charge placed at a point 1.6 cm to the left of the
middle charge?? Answer in units of N.

This is what I did:

I used Fx = k*|Q|*(qx/r^2)

Q= 1.2*E-6

I plugged in 8.6*E-6 into the above equation (keep in mind i used 3.7cm-1.6cm =2.1 cm --> .021m) and got F1=210.320898

I plugged in 4*E-6 into the above equation (i used .016m) and got F2=168.5165625

I plugged in -1.2*E-6 into the above equation (i used .016+.032=.048m) and got F3 = -5.61721875

Then for F final = -F1 + F2 - F3 = -36.187

Since it asks for magnitude I plugged in 36.187. It came up as wrong... where did i go wrong??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be great if someone can offer any help within the next 3 hours.
 
According to the way you've defined F1, F2 and F3, your net force should be

Fnet = -F1 + F2 + F3

which comes out as 47 something Newtons.
 
jdstokes said:
According to the way you've defined F1, F2 and F3, your net force should be

Fnet = -F1 + F2 + F3

which comes out as 47 something Newtons.

Wow, that was it. Thanks A LOT! People like you make this site awesome. Thanks again. :approve:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top