Charges mass on the end of a light string

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angle a charged mass makes with a vertical charged sheet and determining the surface charge density for a specific angle. The initial calculation for the angle was correctly found to be approximately 21.25 degrees using the formula θ=tan-1(qE/mg). For part two, participants debated the correct approach to find the electric field E and the surface charge density σ, clarifying that E should be calculated based on the new charge density. Ultimately, the correct method involves rearranging the equation to isolate E and then using it to find σ, which was successfully resolved by one participant. The thread concludes with a resolution to the problem, highlighting the collaborative effort in solving the physics question.
MissPenguins
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charged mass on the end of a light string is
attached to a point on a uniformly charged
vertical sheet (with areal charge density
0.25 μC/m2) of infinite extent.

Look at attachment for diagram
Find the angle \theta the thread makes with the
vertically charged sheet. The acceleration of
gravity is 9.8 m/s2 and the permittivity of free
space is 8.854 × 10−12 C2/N · m2 .
Answer in units of degree.
I got the first part right to be 21.254189 using \theta=tan-1(qE/mg)
I need help with part 2
Find \sigma for an angle of 77o .
Answer in units of μC/m2.


Homework Equations


\theta=tan-1(qE/mg)
qE = \sigma/2Eo


The Attempt at a Solution


Since \theta=tan-1(qE/mg), so I did tan(77o) = (qE)(mg)
qE = 0.0038118 (calculated from part 1)
mg = 0.0098
\sigma=(qE)(mg) = 7.51677X10-13
Converted back to uC = 7.51677X10-7

What did I do wrong? Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • physicsforum.jpg
    physicsforum.jpg
    3.9 KB · Views: 671
Physics news on Phys.org
E will be different for part 2, since the charge density is different.

Also, did you mean (qE)/(mg) instead of (qE)(mg)?
 
Redbelly98 said:
E will be different for part 2, since the charge density is different.

Also, did you mean (qE)/(mg) instead of (qE)(mg)?

Yea. tan(77) = (qE/mg) which is qE=mgtan(77) = 0.04244
I am not sure what other charge density do I have to use. E0is a constant, that's given.
PLEASE HELP!

Same question as this one https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=109643
Except part 2 was not explained.
 
Okay, found another mistake:
MissPenguins said:
qE = \sigma/2Eo
Actually, it's E = \sigma/2eo (no q here).

Does that help?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Okay, found another mistake:

Actually, it's E = \sigma/2eo (no q here).

Does that help?

The previous one wasn't a mistake.
It's qE = mgtan(77) = 0.042448
I already did this \sigma = (E)(2Eo).
So (0.042448)(2(8.85X10-12) = 7.5133X10-13. I converted back to uC = 7.51633X10-7. And it is wrong! :(
 
MissPenguins said:
The previous one wasn't a mistake.
It's qE = mgtan(77) = 0.042448
I agree, qE = 0.042448 N.

So based on that, what is E equal to?

I already did this \sigma = (E)(2Eo).
So (0.042448)(2(8.85X10-12) = 7.5133X10-13.
Okay. But E is not 0.042448 -- see my comment above.
 
Redbelly98 said:
I agree, qE = 0.042448 N.

So based on that, what is E equal to?


Okay. But E is not 0.042448 -- see my comment above.

You said E is different for part 2 since the charge density changed. So how do I find E? I attempted to do (0.25E-6)/(2*8.854E-12) = 14117.91281 for E, is this right for E?
Then use (14117.91281)(2*8.854E-12) = 2.5E-7?
It doesn't make sense. Can you give me more hints? Thanks.
 
You've already written an equation of the form

tan(θ) = (q*E)/(m*g)

Can you not rearrange to find E? With E can you find σ ?
 
I figured the problem out. Thank you very much everyone!
 
Back
Top