Charges placed at corners of a square

  • Thread starter Thread starter krtica
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Square
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the center of a square with charges of +4.8 placed at each corner. The superposition principle is applied, leading to the conclusion that the total potential at the center is the sum of the potentials from each charge. Although the electric field at the center is zero due to symmetry, this does not imply that the electric potential is also zero; rather, it indicates a local extremum. The potential can be adjusted by shifting its value, as only potential differences are physically meaningful. Ultimately, the potential at the center must be calculated to determine its exact value.
krtica
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
What would be the general approach to the problem? This isn't a homework question..

Q: Charges of +4.8 are placed on corners of square, each side being 8m. What is the electric potential at the center of the square?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential satisfies a superposition principle. So V(r) = V1(r) + V2(r) + ... + Vn(r), where Vi(r) is the position at position r due to the i-th charge.

In this case, you can use the symmetry, so at the origin
V(0) = 4 V1(0)
with V1(0) the potential at the origin due to a charge on one corner of the square.

Note that the electric field at the origin will be zero, as the origin is an equilibrium point: all the charges are attracting or repelling your test charge with the same force, so it will stay put.
 
Thank you. Does that imply that the center of the square would have zero potential?
 
No. Do the calculation. Figure out the electric potential induced by each charge.
 
Recall that the force on the charge is F = q E, with q the charge and E the electric field, while E = -grad V, with V the potential.
So it only implies that V is at a local minimum or maximum (or saddle point) such that grad V = 0, it doesn't say anything about the value of V. (Of course, if you want, you can make it 0 by shifting the potential everywhere by some constant. The reason is that only potential differences have physical meaning, so we can always choose the value of the potential at one point. Usually we let it be zero at some point infinitely far away, though, from which the textbook formula for the potential of a point charge derives).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Back
Top