Chemical engineer how useful would FORTRAN be

AI Thread Summary
FORTRAN remains a relevant programming language for chemical engineers, despite perceptions of it being outdated. It is still utilized in various scientific and engineering applications, particularly because many foundational math and engineering software packages were originally developed in FORTRAN. While some argue that knowing BASIC is sufficient, others suggest that familiarity with FORTRAN can be beneficial, especially for understanding legacy systems and interfacing with modern languages like C++. The language's continued use in specific research areas, such as particle physics, highlights its ongoing significance in certain fields. Overall, while newer languages are gaining popularity, a basic understanding of FORTRAN can still be advantageous for chemical engineers.
omagdon7
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
As a chemical engineer how useful would FORTRAN be to me. It is listed on the University of Florida's ChemE homepage as a good language, but I have heard it is on its way out.

All Comments Welcome
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I saw your post and just had to reply. I'm not a programmer but I learned fortran way back before there were PCs. I was an engineering student and took the math department course (there was no computer science department then) called Intorduction to Computing. I kept the text for old times sake. It even has a key punch card as a bookmarker (lol).

Anyway to answer your question. In my opinion, if you know BASIC there is no point. There may be a few differences but basically it's structured the same. A high level language.

Regards
Don
 
omagdon7 said:
As a chemical engineer how useful would FORTRAN be to me. It is listed on the University of Florida's ChemE homepage as a good language, but I have heard it is on its way out.

All Comments Welcome

yeah, that's what i keep on hearing, too.

but, for instance, my friend is doing an REU at u-chicago right now. and she had to use fortran to ...do something particle physics-y.

the advice that i got from my undergrad physics adviser is that it's easy to learn fortran once you have learned c++ but the opposite is not necessarily true.
 
FORTRAN has been on its way out for more years than I can count!

It is still used because so many of the first large math/engineering packages were written in FORTRAN. Actually most C++ compilers (For example. Same for Ada, etc.) allow C++ programs to call FORTRAN subroutines but it is still a good idea to know basic FORTRAN so you will understand the function calling format.
 
... and it seems that the later releases are still used, developed and going to be used to such extent that I'm starting to think whether it'll die at all.
 
Isn't C gaining popularity? It's probably best to learn both, althought I don't know much about chemical engineering.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top