What is the density of the calcite sample?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the density of the calcite sample, the mass of the fluid in the density bottle is calculated by subtracting the empty bottle weight from the filled weight, resulting in 2.9817 grams. The weight of the bottle filled with water is also used to find the volume of the bottle, utilizing the known density of water at 25 degrees Celsius. The volume can then be applied to calculate the density of the dense fluid used to suspend the calcite. The mass of the calcite can be inferred from the weight of the fluid displaced when the calcite floats. Ultimately, these calculations will yield the density of the calcite sample.
Nano
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A technique once used by geologists to measure the density of a mineral is to mix two dense liquids in such proportions that the mineral grains just float. When a sample of the mixture in which the mineral calcite just floats is put in a special density bottle, the weight is 15.4448 . When empty, the bottle weighs 12.4631 , and when filled with water, it weighs 13.5441 .
What is the density of the calcite sample?
(Density of water at 25degrees = .9970g/ml)

Homework Equations



D = mass/volume
mass of floating object = mass of displaced fluid

The Attempt at a Solution



15.4448-13.5441= mass of calcite? Not sure if that is exactly the mass of the calcite, but even so, don't know how to find out the volume of calcite. And what to do with the mass of the bottle filled with water?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The bottle, when empty, has a mass of 12.4631. When filled with the dense fluid, it has a mass of 15.4448. Therefore, the mass of fluid in the bottle is 15.4448-12.4631=2.9817.

You can do the same thing with the water to work out the mass of water that will fill the bottle.

You are given the density of the water, so based on the mass you can calculate the volume of the bottle. You can then use this volume to calculate the density of the other fluid.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top