Chemistry- Electron Affinity very confused

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on ranking atoms by electron affinity, with G (Li), H (H), and K (He) being analyzed. The user initially believes that the order of electron affinity corresponds to ionization energy, suggesting GHK as the ranking. However, it is clarified that while both properties are related to an atom's tendency to gain or lose electrons, they measure different energy changes. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering the stability and energy changes associated with adding an electron, particularly in relation to the octet rule. Ultimately, understanding these distinctions helps clarify the ranking of electron affinity among the atoms.
Null_
Messages
227
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


e3-16.gif

Rank the atoms in electron affinity, from smallest to largest.


Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution



G has the highest energy, followed by H then K. I looked at the diagram and saw that-
G= 1s^2 2s^1 (Li)
H= 1s^1 (H)
K= 1s^2 (He)

I know that ionization energy and electron affinity both are very high at F. There was a question about the IE, and I got it right as GHK. I thought that IE and EA were related to each other...IE is the want to become a cation (Which the top right surely doesn't want to do), and EA is the change in E when an e- is added...adding an e- to F takes a lot of E, but it's very stable.

I thought that the EA from low to high is the same as IE (GHK). I don't see why it isn't.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They tend to follow the same trend, because they both measure how much an atom 'likes' electrons. The details are a little different however. You're definitely on the right track: IE is how much energy is required to remove an electron, and EA is how much energy is gained when an electron is added.

Looking at the atoms in the figure, compare the energy of the current state with the energy of adding another electron (think about the octet rule mostly); which atom would be 'happiest' to gain an electron?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top