Chernobyl accident vs candu 3 reactor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for a Chernobyl-like accident occurring in a CANDU 3 reactor. Key points include the importance of comparing containment structures and shutdown processes between the two reactor types. The Chernobyl disaster involved a "loss of coolant" meltdown, prompting a comparison of coolant loss prevention methods in CANDU reactors. Participants suggest consulting specialized resources, such as the Nuclear Engineering board, for more detailed information. Understanding these differences is crucial for assessing the safety of CANDU reactors in relation to the Chernobyl incident.
shanktank
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Quick question I'm having a hard time finding much information, or at least information I'm absorbing. I'm just supposed to write a paragraph on:

Could the same accident at Chernobyl happen in a CANDU 3 reactor?

Anything to help get me started anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
everyone stumped like me
 
shanktank said:
Hello,
Quick question I'm having a hard time finding much information, or at least information I'm absorbing. I'm just supposed to write a paragraph on:

Could the same accident at Chernobyl happen in a CANDU 3 reactor?

Anything to help get me started anyone?
The Nuclear Engineering board might be a better place to find your answer.

You would have to compare the containment structures for both reactors. Since Chernobyl was being shut-down when it had a melt-down, you may want to compare the shut-down process for both reactors. Chernobyl was a "loss of coolant" melt-down you may wish to compare the methods of each for preventing loss of coolant.

AM
 
http://canteach.candu.org/library/19910101.pdf

read the above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
66
Views
20K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top