Child, Chair, and Spring Scale on Pulley: Forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a child, a chair, and a spring scale on a pulley system. The initial calculations suggest that the effective weight on the child's side is 230 N, leading to an acceleration of 0.408 m/s². However, there is skepticism about the legitimacy of using "effective weight" in this context, as the spring scale reading of 250 N is actually the tension in the rope, not the weight of the scale itself. To solve the problem correctly, participants are advised to draw free body diagrams and apply Newton's second law to analyze the forces acting on the child and chair combination. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the system's dynamics rather than relying on potentially flawed assumptions.
minimario
Messages
95
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


4zJjMRV.png


Homework Equations



$F=ma$

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) Because the spring scale weighs 250 N, the effective weight on the child's side is 230 N. Therefore, $T-230 = \frac{230}{9.8} a$ and $T-250 = -\frac{250}{9.8} a$, so $a = 0.408$.

This is correct, but is the solution really legitimate? The "effective weight" argument seems a bit suspicious and nonrigorous.

(b) I have no idea where to even start. How would the "effective weights" work here? (Or would it even work?)

Thanks,
minimario
 
Physics news on Phys.org
minimario said:

Homework Statement


4zJjMRV.png


Homework Equations



$F=ma$

The Attempt at a Solution



(a) Because the spring scale weighs 250 N, the effective weight on the child's side is 230 N. Therefore, $T-230 = \frac{230}{9.8} a$ and $T-250 = -\frac{250}{9.8} a$, so $a = 0.408$.

This is correct, but is the solution really legitimate? The "effective weight" argument seems a bit suspicious and nonrigorous.

(b) I have no idea where to even start. How would the "effective weights" work here? (Or would it even work?)

Thanks,
minimario

Hello minimario,

Welcome to Physics Forums! :)

First, here's a link to get you started with using \LaTeX on Phyisics Forums.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physics-forums-faq-and-howto.617567/#post-3977517

No, I don't think your approach is the correct way to go about this problem, even if it did coincidentally lead to the correct answer in this case.

The "250 N" is not the weight of the spring scale, rather it is the reading on the spring scale. You should consider the spring scale itself to be massless. That it means is that the tension in the rope is 250 N.

Whenever you work with a massless and frictionless rope and pulley, it means that the tension of the rope on one side of the pulley is equal to the tension on the other side (I think it is valid from this problem to assume that the rope is also massless and the pully is both massless and frictionless).

(i) Draw a free body diagram (FBD) of all the forces acting on the child+chair combination. Don't forget that the rope has two ends! (Hint: you already know the tension on the rope. Just don't forget both ends.)

(ii) What is the net force acting on the child+chair combination (i.e., sum together all the force vectors, to find the net force vector [and don't forget they are vectors, not scalars])?

(iii) What is the the mass of the child+chair combination. (i.e., not the weight, but the mass)?

(iv) Invoke Newton's second law of motion to find the acceleration.

[Edit: For part b, start by drawing a FBD of all the forces acting only on the child. Hint: you know the child's mass (or you can calculate it now) and the child's acceleration from previous calculations. You also know the child's weight (gravitational force) and the force from the rope that the child is holding onto. Invoke Newton's second law again, and solve for the remaining force on the child from the chair.]
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top