Chiral nematic liquid crystals - describing light diffraction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an equation that describes the wavelengths of light diffracted by a chiral nematic liquid crystal, specifically λ = np√((1-cos2θ)/n2). A key point of confusion arises regarding the relationship between this equation and the expression p*sinθ. It is suggested that the term inside the square root simplifies to sin²θ, leading to the cancellation of the refractive index (n) and implying that wavelength does not depend on it. However, this interpretation raises questions about the underlying theory and the validity of the simplification. The conversation highlights the need for clarity on how the refractive index interacts with the pitch of the helix and the angle of diffraction in determining the wavelength.
maxbashi
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
So my book has an equation describing the wavelengths of light that are diffracted by a chiral nematic liquid crystal in terms of the refractive index (n), the pitch of the helix (p), and the angle (θ) with respect to the surface. The equation is this -

λ = np√((1-cos2θ)/n2)

If this isn't clear, inside the square root is (1-cos2θ) divided by n2. But isn't this whole expression the same as p*sinθ? I would think the top of the square root would equal sin2θ, then with the square root the n's would cancel. But this would mean that the wavelength doesn't depend on the diffraction index at all. Am I doing something dumb here?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
No idea about the theory behind, but if the equation is

\lambda = n p \sqrt{\frac {1-\cos^2(\theta)}{n^2}} = p \sqrt{1-\cos^2(\theta)}

you are right about n canceling.

(see our \LaTeX FAQ for details on equation formatting, it comes handy in situations like this).
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top