Circuit analysis complex numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a circuit analysis problem involving complex numbers, specifically the calculations of impedances for capacitors, inductors, and resistors. The user expresses frustration over repeatedly arriving at the same answer despite extensive review of the textbook. Key calculations include the impedance of a capacitor and inductor, leading to the combined impedance of a circuit segment. A critical point highlighted is the importance of converting frequency from Hz to rad/sec to avoid errors. Ultimately, the user realizes a simple mistake in their calculations, leading to a resolution of their confusion.
x86
Gold Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Selection_027.png


I'm going crazy. I've done this problem nearly 20 times and keep getting the same answer. I've read my textbook so many times too! What am I doing wrong?

Homework Equations


Zcapacitor = 1/(jwC)
Zinductor = jwL
Zresistor = R

The Attempt at a Solution



Z for the capacitor -j1.667*10^3
Z for the inductor is j0.6

Z1 contains the capacitor and resistor on the righthand side of the circuit

Z1 = 2 - j1.667*10^3

Calculate Z12 (Z1 in parallel with the 22 ohm resistor)

1/Z12 = 1/22 + (2+j1.667*10^3)/(2.78*10^6)
Z12 =21.99-j2.903*10^-1

Z123 = Z12 in series with the inductor = 21.99 - j0.2903 + j0.6 = 21.99 + j0.309
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget to convert simple frequency f, which has units of Hz, to radial frequency ω, which has units of rad/sec.
 
  • Like
Likes x86
collinsmark said:
Don't forget to convert simple frequency f, which has units of Hz, to radial frequency ω, which has units of rad/sec.

Such a simple mistake on my part. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top