Engineering Circuit Analysis for Power Transmission Network Question

AI Thread Summary
A lossless power transmission network is defined as one that contains no resistances, meaning it does not lose real energy, as reactances only store and release energy without loss. The power flow is expressed as Re[Vi(t) Ii,k(t)*] because the complex conjugate of the current is necessary to accurately represent the power factor angle. This is due to the multiplication of phasors, where the angle corresponding to the power factor is derived from the difference between the voltage and current angles. The use of the complex conjugate ensures that the angle for power calculations reflects the correct relationship between voltage and current. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing power transmission networks effectively.
Constantinos
Messages
80
Reaction score
1
Hey!

Below you will find a piece of text I found on a paper. There are some things I don't get, perhaps you could help me.

What it means for the network to be lossless?
Also, why is the power flow equal to Re[Vi(t) Ii,k(t)*] and not outright Vi(t)*Ii,k(t) ? Why the complex conjugate?

I get the math, but not the definitions really!

attachment.php?attachmentid=46400&stc=1&d=1334832268.jpg

 

Attachments

  • Image.jpg
    Image.jpg
    29.3 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
A lossless network contains no resistances, so no real energy can be lost by that network (remember that reactances only store and release energy without loss).

The complex conjugate of the current is used in order to get the phosor angle correct for the power. It has to do with how phasors are multiplied.

Suppose:
##V = |V| \angle \phi_v##
##I = |I| \angle \phi_i ##

Multiplying:
##V I = |V||I| \angle \phi_v + \phi_i##

However, for the power we should have the angle corresponding to the power factor:

##\phi_v - \phi_i = \phi~~~~##

So we need to invert the sign of the current angle, hence the complex conjugate is taken.
 
gneill said:
A lossless network contains no resistances, so no real energy can be lost by that network (remember that reactances only store and release energy without loss).

Ah yes I see, having susceptance means it also has reactance (I forgot about that).

gneill said:
The complex conjugate of the current is used in order to get the phosor angle correct for the power. It has to do with how phasors are multiplied.

Suppose:
##V = |V| \angle \phi_v##
##I = |I| \angle \phi_i ##

Multiplying:
##V I = |V||I| \angle \phi_v + \phi_i##

However, for the power we should have the angle corresponding to the power factor:

##\phi_v - \phi_i = \phi~~~~##

So we need to invert the sign of the current angle, hence the complex conjugate is taken.

I'm not sure I understand. Why would we need the angle of the power factor and not the angle of power itself? By power factor I assume you mean this correct?
 
Constantinos said:
I'm not sure I understand. Why would we need the angle of the power factor and not the angle of power itself? By power factor I assume you mean this correct?

If you expand VI* then:

##V I^* = |V||I| \angle \phi = |V||I| cos(\phi) + j|V||I| sin(\phi)##

But this is just the sum of the real and imaginary power P + jQ.

##VI^* = P + jQ##
 
Yes I think I get it now, thanks for the clarifications!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top